Live data from Hacker News

English is a pictographic language with 26 radicals

smbc-comics.com

1–10 of 112 posts

Re: English is a pictographic language with 26 radicals

#4
My teacher used to argue that modern English would have been better off taking the Chinese writing system rather than the Roman one. The way it works now you have all the drawbacks (i.e. you need to memorise a whole lot of pronunciation) but none of the benefit (i.e. faster reading speeds, more compact representation).

Re: English is a pictographic language with 26 radicals

#7

My teacher used to argue that modern English would have been better off taking the Chinese writing system rather than the Roman one. The way it works now you have all the drawbacks (i.e. you need to memorise a whole lot of pronunciation) but none of the benefit (i.e. faster reading speeds, more compact representation).

[dead]

Re: English is a pictographic language with 26 radicals

#8

My teacher used to argue that modern English would have been better off taking the Chinese writing system rather than the Roman one. The way it works now you have all the drawbacks (i.e. you need to memorise a whole lot of pronunciation) but none of the benefit (i.e. faster reading speeds, more compact representation).

Rather than going to that extreme, English spelling could be made easier.

My native language is Dutch. For Dutch there are spelling reforms every so many years. English is still using Shakespeare's spelling, I think.

The advantage of spelling reforms is that spelling can stay much closer to how a word is pronounced, and that it's much more standardized. The disadvantage is that older texts become hard to read much sooner. It's amazing how English from the 19th century (like _Three Men In A Boat_) is effortlessly readable, whereas Dutch from before WW2 is noticeably old.

Post reply on HN