... on Legacy ISA. I'd rather a RISC-V Pinetab-V, based on the same JH7110 as VisionFive 2.
> ... on Legacy ISA. Since when is x86 legacy? > I'd rather a RISC-V Pinetab-V, based on the same JH7110 as VisionFive 2. Have you actually used one of those? They are excruciatingly slow. Less performance than most Raspberry Pi. Maybe it works for your niche workflow, but for StarLite to succeed they'll have to build a _usable_ product. Also competitive ARM based alternatives (such as Snapdragon) require many closed…
Since the first commercial RISC chips obsoleted x86 in the 80s.
>Have you actually used one of those?
Yes, JH7110 on VisionFive 2.
>They are excruciatingly slow. Less performance than most Raspberry Pi.
Not my experience, owning VisionFive 2 and all raspberry pi B boards (1,2,3,3+ and 4), all of which have been used heavily.
The CPU is much faster than RPi3b+'s while using way less power. Only a little slower than RPi4, and this is assuming the RPi4 has a huge heatsink like mine does. JH7110 doesn't require a heatsink nor throttle under load, for it stays under 75C even when running builds 24/7, yet is designed to survive 125C.
Whereas everything else in the SoC is better. Especially the GPU, which in the RPi4 is anemic, and can barely keep up even for 2d at 1080p. The experience is much better on VisionFive 2 for even simple tasks like web browsing, and it's not even close. Night and day.
Nevermind the upstream support effort[0] getting this far in just a few months (indiegogo delivery was in March), and follows standard RISC-V boot/firmware interface specifications, whereas Raspberry Pi is all bespoke and never cared much about upstreaming support.
>Also competitive ARM based alternatives (such as Snapdragon) require many closed source blobs to function.
Here I just do not understand what point you're trying to make.