Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The anaesthetic agent is not a drug that one is supposed to take for the remaining of their life and has no observed side-effects in general. This is notably untrue. General anaesthesia is associated with higher risks of dementia. Especially the older the person being treated. While there's some disagreement here - short term cognitive decline is inarguable as a side-effect (called post-operative cognitive decline)…
I don't see how your link establishes that what I said is notably untrue.
What you said is: "[anaesthetic agent] has no observed side effects in general" and that's just not true.
As an aside - my grandmother had hip surgery at 86 and was never the same mentally afterwards. She could walk, but she couldn't remember who her family was. It was not particularly unexpected (she had an existing diagnoses of alzheimers) but the change post-surgery was notable enough that the entire family discussed it. It was like she had been slipping a bit, but the surgery threw her off a cliff. The difference between knowing who you are, but discussing the weather every half hour or so, to having no idea who the people around her were.
Personally - I would firmly place anesthetics into a fairly risky category of drug that we have a very poor understanding of. Which is decidedly not where you are placing it.