Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

news.ycombinator.com

291–300 of 532 posts

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#291
"Anne Frank Remembered: The Story of the Woman Who Helped to Hide the Frank Family" By Miep Gies.

(The Disney+ series "A Small Light" is loosely based on the events in this book.)

Miep was Otto Frank's employee, close friend of the Franks, and helped hide the family during the time that Anne wrote her diary. (She was the person finding the Frank's food.) After the Franks were arrested, Miep rescued the diary and then gave it to Otto Frank when he learned that Anne didn't survive the concentration camps.

The book gives significantly more context than Anne's diary regarding who the Franks were, and the struggles they encountered. Not only is it a vital companion to Anne Frank's diary, Miep's account of Amsterdam during WWII describes in detail what life was like under the Nazi regime. She gives a lot more of the "who, what, where, why, and how," that Anne's diary omits. (Remember, Anne was a teenager who, initially, was writing for herself and not for a global audience.)

The first section of the book describes some of Miep's background, how she met the Franks, their relationship, and the history of the Franks. The second section describes the period where she helped hide the Franks, and often gives an alternate perspective to events that Anne wrote about. The third section describes the Frank's arrest and the famine that happened in Amsterdam before the Germans surrendered.

I read the book because some events in "A Small Light" were a little difficult to believe. And, yes, the events in "A Small Light" that I didn't believe weren't part of the book.

Edit: https://www.amazon.com/Anne-Frank-Remembered-Helped-Family-e...

Edit 2: I also recently re-read Anne Frank's diary. As an adult with children, it provides a strong reminder of how teenagers' minds work. It also shows that even our heros were immature as youngsters. In Miep's afterword, she points out that she was really hurt at the way that Anne described some of the people in hiding.

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#292
post #101

The Dawn of Everything, by Graeber and Wengrow. Refutes most of the claims made by Harari in Sapiens, and shows everything you though you knew about prehistory is plain wrong. It's a great book, very well written and well informed. Made me think that humanity's history isn't an arrow pointing in the direction of progress; we make experiments. Our current way of life is not the "best so far", it's but one arrangement…

For what it's worth, sapiens was generally hated by academic anthropologists but Dawn of everything is generally hated by everyone else. Graeber was always expressly advocating for one specific (anarchist) viewpoint in his work, and that book suffers mightily for it.

Don't take anything in that book as true, because I've read lots of academics losing their minds over how much he glossed over or just ignored contrary evidence.

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#293
post #165

It’s been probably a year since I read The WEIRDest People in the World by Joseph Henrich, but the ideas in there have really stuck in my head. The WEIRD acronym stands for Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic. The thesis is that the Christian Church inadvertently created modern society by prohibiting polygamy and cousin marriage. The topic of polygamy is what’s really stuck in my head. Polygamy is…

Ya right. Like any one in their right mind wants to have 10 wives to deal with. Dont get confuse hooking up with marriage. I think Esther Perel has written the best stuff on modern relationships. Read her.

What do you mean "to deal with"? There's a lot of misconceptions about marriage, having to "manage" your spouse is one of them. You don't, they're their own person, they can take care of themselves, and if they're dependent on you it's not a healthy marriage.

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#294
post #79

Never Split The Difference by Chris Voss, on negotiation tactics. Much better than "Getting to Yes". The Genius of The Few by Christian and Barbara Joy O'Brien, an alternative take for garden of eden and Anunnaki compared to Sitchin Built To Sell by John Warrillow, on how to build a business you can exit with a profit. I read 30+ books in the last and this year so there are others but three is enough for this list.

I didn’t find a single practical take away in the Voss book. The entire thing was him boasting about his “accomplishments”. I’d go as far as saying it was totally useless.

then you must have some learning disability because it was very well written. if i were to explain it to someone, i would say that the main idea was that you have two parties, two houses. you walk into the other party's house and simply let them explain their reasoning to you. you are indirectly confronting them. and by letting them do the talking, they have to back up everything they are saying, which leads to "gotcha" avoidance and makes the other side slowly chop off their demands that are not based on the truth until you get to the core of their wants or needs without all the fluff and glitter around it. if the other party would be as good in negotiating as you, they would then come into your house and let you do the talking, exposing your bs, not just theirs. but since that does not happen, you end up victorious, in a sense.

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#295
1) The Dark Forest by Liu Cixin

It's the second book in The Three Body Problem series. To be honest, I found it a bit dull in similar ways to the first book in the series. There are good chunks of technical details (Hard Scifi), and specific ideas or concepts that are interesting, but it's then brought up during romantic relationships and other matters I'm not not invested in. If you can get passed the parts that drone on about flowers and clouds and whatnot, there's some good meat.

I don't want to give too much away, but I'll try to give you the general premise of situations that come up in each book:

* How does a civilization examine and come to understand the world around it, if that world is incredibly unstable and deadly at some points, and eerily stable at others?

* How would worldly matters like strife, unrest, famine, and suffering impact the mindset of people who attempt contact with other civilizations?

* If all you have is a rock and a loin cloth, how could you possibly fight someone with strategic bombers and nuclear warheads? ...

* ... Assuming you came up with any ideas at all, how would those plans or inventions impact the society you live in? How long would you need to prepare to even offer the semblance of a fight against that kind of enemy? ...

* ... If the threat you face is by an enemy that can hear every word you say, and read every word you write, how could you even begin to plan or mount any kind of a defense against it?

2) The Celtic World by Dr. Jennifer Paxton, PhD

A detailed look at the Celtic identity throughout history. Where did they come from? Who are they? Where do they live? What were their beliefs? What is their legacy in the modern day?

There's nothing specific that I can point to and say "And this is why you should listen to it!" It's simply very well done. It wraps up the history in a way that is engaging, without being excessive or dull, while still feeling incredibly detailed. It's entertaining, engaging, but also factual. In areas where things are murky or grey, the author makes it clear what is opinion, what is known, and what is uncertain. It doesn't feel like "infotainment" ala Discovery Channel, TLC, etc. It feels like those classic documentaries or miniseries you could sometimes find, where something hit that perfect mix of being: well produced, insightful, and complete.

You can feel the genuine passion that the author has for the topic, and it shines through to such a degree that, if you have even a passing interest in the topic, or history in general, you're sure to find something in there that piques your interest.

I also really appreciated that the author made a point of not looking her nose down at any misconceptions that people may have about various aspects of the Celtic world. There are a lot of half-truths and outright falsehoods that I had been told about the historical Celt that are wrong. It would have been incredibly easy for the author to sneer at such errors as "uneducated nonsense" or some other dismissive comment, but the author didn't do that at all! She made a point of saying that common misconceptions are...well, common, and that it's understandable that people think this way or that as a result. It was completely free of the kind of pretention that I had been concerned about, which made it far more accessible as a complete dullard on the topic.

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#296
I've been slowly going through Divine Proportions: Rational Trigonometry to Universal Geometry, by Norman J. Wildberger.

Wildberger is a mathematician, and a finitist. This means that he doesn't believe in infinity in the modern mathematical sense (I'm sure he won't dispute that the integers are unbound, for example). Which means he does not believe that Real numbers are properly defined either, or that limits are really a thing.

So he put his money where is mouth is and invented a branch of trigonometry that only uses rational numbers, by replacing length and angle with square distance (which he calls "quadrance") and the square of the sine (which he calls "spread").

All of the above is just what motivated him, what's interesting is that the resulting maths itself is all correct and quite nice to go through. It basically boils down to saying "hey, it's called trigonometry for a reason, so maybe it makes more sense to make actual triangles the fundamental unit, not circles," and working your way from there.

Personally I'm kind of curious if his approach might be more practical for computer implementations too, since all number representations on computers are either rational numbers or approximations of other numbers via rational numbers.

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#297
post #265

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But if you read a book called No More Mr. Nice Guy aren’t you implicitly calling yourself a Nice Guy?

Interesting theory. If I tell you I read Jurassic Park, does that that mean I'm a brontosaurus?

Presumably you’re not reading Jurassic Park as a self-help book, but if you are, then yes, you’re probably a dinosaur.

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#298
post #22

Finished reading The Three-Body Problem (Book 1) and it's such a fascinating read! https://www.amazon.com/Three-Body-Problem-Remembrance-Earths...

I have mixed feelings about it, the premise is interesting but the writing is very bad in my opinion. The pacing is all over the place and the dialogue is like aliens trying to imitate normal human conversation... I would still recommend it to sci-fi fans, just don't expect a literary masterpiece.

I thought that also the sci part was not very good. You really need to suspend that disbelief. I was disappointed, especially by the final part of the book.

In contrast, Exhalation by Chiang, which I read in the same period, was an excellent book, with much less reliance on unknown physics/technology, and more what-if and near-future social exploration. It had one mind-blowing story that'll stay with me because of its sheer audacity: can we be alone if the Bible is 100% right?

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#299

It’s been probably a year since I read The WEIRDest People in the World by Joseph Henrich, but the ideas in there have really stuck in my head. The WEIRD acronym stands for Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic. The thesis is that the Christian Church inadvertently created modern society by prohibiting polygamy and cousin marriage. The topic of polygamy is what’s really stuck in my head. Polygamy is…

> natural state for civilized human societies "Natural" state. For "civilized" societies. Do you realize just how stupid it sounds?

They're very loaded terms for sure; see https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Is%E2%80%93ought_problem#Natur... and https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature for example. I couldn't find a poignant link for "civilized", but that too has Connotations - that there's uncivil societies that commit uncivil behaviour like idk, monogamy.

Re: Ask HN: Any interesting books you have read lately?

#300
post #158

"This is how you lose the time war". It's by two authors. Light read. I bought it because it was inexpensive and I the title was a "me-shaped" hook. :) I chuckled after a few pages, after about 1/3rd I couldn't put it down, or read it fast enough. Challenging, as it started to rain during my walk to work (as evidenced by the dozen wrinkly pages towards the end). The next day as I read, I was pacing around my apartmen…

I just read the synopsys, I love the summary - even though time travel stories are paradoxical in nature. Love seeing how some authors try and resolve them though.
Post reply on HN