Azure ChatGPT: Private and secure ChatGPT for internal enterprise use

Post by FrenchDevRemote » Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 7:43 PM UTC

baobabKoodaa wrote: post #38

FrenchDevRemote wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

chatgpt is obviously a LOT better, llama doesn't even understand some prompts and since LLMs aren't even that good to begin with, it's obvious you want the SOTA to do anything useful unless maybe you're finetuning

> and since LLMs aren't even that good to begin with, it's obvious you want the SOTA to do anything useful unless maybe you're finetuning This is overkill. First of all, ChatGPT isn't even the SOTA, so if you "want SOTA to do anything useful", then this ChatGPT offering would be as useless as LLaMA according to you. Second, there are many individual tasks where even those subpar LLaMA models are useful - even without…

Post by simmerup » Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 7:45 PM UTC

Buttons840 wrote: post #32

theptip wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The concern is that ChatGPT is training on your chats (by default, you can opt out but you lose chat history last I checked). So in general enterprises cannot allow internal users to paste private code into ChatGPT, for example.

As an example of this. I found that GPT4 wouldn't agree with me that C(A) = C(AA^T) until I explained the proof. A few weeks later it would agree in new chats and would explain using the same proof I did presented the same way.

Post by jensen2k » Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 7:47 PM UTC

Y_Y wrote: post #3

So the public access one isn't private and secure?

Post by infinityio » Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 7:47 PM UTC

behnamoh wrote: post #47

Buttons840 wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an example of this. I found that GPT4 wouldn't agree with me that C(A) = C(AA^T) until I explained the proof. A few weeks later it would agree in new chats and would explain using the same proof I did presented the same way.

This is kinda creepy. But at the same time, how do they do that? I thought the training of these models stopped in September 2021/2022. So how do they do these incremental trainings?

Post by voiper1 » Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 7:49 PM UTC

simmerup wrote: post #52

Ecstatify wrote: post #46

Our company is pushing everyone to use a similar offering. Most of the company is doing low value work … still using excels even though we have a custom ERP. Now seeing people who couldn’t write a coherent email before write 3 page emails. The illusion of being productive by doing more work even though it has zero impact on the bottom line. It’s insane how inefficient organisations are. No doubt we’ll have some KPI s…

If anything it's less productive because people have to parse all that nonsense. I was gobsmacked to hear a friend say that their work guidance is to use ChatGPT to write letters to external clients for example. I know for sure I'd be insulted if someone sent me paragraphs of text to read created from a sentence long prompt. I'd rather have the prompt, my time is valuable as well.