21–30 of 349 posts
Crappy clone of ChatGPT frontend, half missing, half direct copy. Implied and overly vast claims of insecurity + lack of privacy, that are narrowly true, i.e. for _Chat_GPT. Really surprised to see this aggressive of language 1) written down 2) on Github. I'd be pretty pissed if I was OpenAI, regardless of the $10B.
So the public access one isn't private and secure?
I thought sama said they don’t use data going through the api for training. Guess we can’t trust that statement
So the public access one isn't private and secure?
How is this different from the other OpenAI GUI? Why another one by Microsoft? https://github.com/microsoft/sample-app-aoai-chatGPT .
Since the only users who would likely care about this derive far more value than the $20/month of OpenAI's direct offering. Why doesn't OpenAI market this service, but with chat history, for something like $200/month?
And the reason is, it's enough for OpenAI to "say" that they're "not going to use your data" - you need a cloud deployment where you can control network boundaries to _prove_ that your data isn't going anywhere it isn't supposed to.
This is potentially a huge deal. Companies are concerned using ChatGPT might violate data privacy policies if someone puts in user data or invalidate trade secrets protections if someone uploads sections of code. I suspect many companies have been waiting for an enterprise version.