Live data from Hacker News

People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share Psychological Features (2019)

scientificamerican.com

1–10 of 34 posts

Re: People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share Psychological Features (2019)

#2
It's unfortunate that "conspiracy theory" has taken on an indisputably negative connotation now. Conspiracies do occur, theories about them form. More often, people and entities behave in concert without conspiring per se, and this could be because of aligned goals or beliefs, or simply regulations that cause corporations to do the same sort of thing, especially when they keep an eye on one another.

For example, is "market rent" a conspiracy? Is it price-fixing or collusion? Hey, I just caught you making a theory!

I think the main bad thing about conspiracy theories (and other theories that may belong to crackpots and crazies) is that the facts mostly can't be known. If in fact there are conspiracies, nobody who's involved will speak openly and truthfully about them, so I guess just follow the money.

Or don't. Why not concern yourself with living your life, enjoying your family and friends, being a good neighbor, having some recreation time outdoors and stuff. All of these things are known cures for the "cluster of psychological features" that may trouble you.

Re: People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share Psychological Features (2019)

#4

.

> > As he delved into this climate change denialism, Lewandowsky, then at the University of Western Australia, discovered that many of the naysayers also believed in outlandish plots, such as the idea that the Apollo moon landing was a hoax created by the American government.

> The opening paragraph expresses an idea not present in Lewandowsky's 2013 paper[1], and looks more like an attempt to link dissent with more obviously fringe theories (much like "anti-vaxxers" and "flat-earthers").

Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Gignac GE (2013) NASA faked the moon landing—therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science 24: 622–633.

Re: People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share Psychological Features (2019)

#6
post #5

What's the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth? About 9 to 18 months... Look at the censorship of speech by Facebook and others concerning COVID, done at the direction of the federal government as just one example.

It took way longer than that for the original conspiracy theory to be factualised. I'm talking about the fact that spooks killed a sitting president

Re: People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share Psychological Features (2019)

#7

It's unfortunate that "conspiracy theory" has taken on an indisputably negative connotation now. Conspiracies do occur, theories about them form. More often, people and entities behave in concert without conspiring per se , and this could be because of aligned goals or beliefs, or simply regulations that cause corporations to do the same sort of thing, especially when they keep an eye on one another. For example, is…

Conspiracy:

An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.

Insofar as 2 or more people have coordinated, colluded, or planned an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act, a conspiracy is afoot.

In fact, almost all significant illegal, wrongful, or subversive acts include conspiracies to commit said acts.

I think it is safe to say that the present sociopolitical and socioeconomic landscapes are rife with activities, writ large, that are, from some reasonable perspective, illegal, wrongful, or subversive in nature.

To remove the idea of conspiracy as a valid concept wielded by reasonable people is perhaps the most surgical of injuries to society which might otherwise seek to prevent or interfere with these kinds of illegal, wrongful, or subversive acts.

When a couple of people decide to rob a liquor store, we call it a conspiracy. When someone suspects that a global cabal of banks might be colluding to screw the world over, we discredit them as a “conspiracy theorist”. (Libor)

Insofar as it is reasonable to suspect that an individual might be capable of doing something illegal, wrongful, or subversive, it is also reasonable to suspect that an organisation might might do the same.

We are conditioned to protect the systems and individuals that parasitise society, because we do not wish to confront the flaws in the system we serve.

That said, there are plenty of nutjobs out there with outrageous claims. Some of them are delusional, some of them are attention seekers, some of them are merely ignorant or misinformed. But we should call them nutjobs, not conspiracy theorists.

We ignore our civic duty to be vigilant “conspiracy theorists” at our peril. In doing so, we give cover to the lies that are big enough to be easy to believe.

Re: People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share Psychological Features (2019)

#8
And then there is that guy that points out the conspiracy to supplant every suspicion that nefarious actors plot against the unsuspecting masses of all others.

There are conspirators against your natural destinies. From profiteers looting government and the populous to secret social and political interests who thrive in the shadow of your refusal to believe.

Incredulity, self assurances, and an indulgent delusion of normalcy obscure and protect these conspiracies.

You are not the America you think you are, you are the America thought controlled.

Re: People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share Psychological Features (2019)

#9

And then there is that guy that points out the conspiracy to supplant every suspicion that nefarious actors plot against the unsuspecting masses of all others. There are conspirators against your natural destinies. From profiteers looting government and the populous to secret social and political interests who thrive in the shadow of your refusal to believe. Incredulity, self assurances, and an indulgent delusion of…

All “conspiracy theories” are actually false-flag PsyOps, designed and deployed to keep the highly suspicious and intuitive distracted, while the actual conspiracies go unnoticed! (/s)

Re: People Drawn to Conspiracy Theories Share Psychological Features (2019)

#10
The really weird thing though is, how people defend their preconceptions with "conspiracy theories", invoking stigma and thereby inhibiting further inquiry.

Which is unfortunate, as the actual reasons are at times much more interesting (and inconvenient) than people's infantilism allows.

There have been real conspiracies (MKULTRA might be remembered, Snowden's leaks were mere consiracy theory pre-leak). And those claiming them to be real were shunned as lunatics.

The (certainly?) currently existing, real conspiracies hide (are hidden?) behind the stigma as well. Is it wise to let them?

Post reply on HN