Live data from Hacker News

A list of recent hostile moves by Google's Chrome team

601–602 of 602 posts

Re: A list of recent hostile moves by Google's Chrome team

#601

Post by kmlx » Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 10:48 AM UTC

rhn_mk1 wrote: post #200

kmlx wrote: post #177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

avif? webp?

https://avif.io/blog/comparisons/avif-vs-webp/ > AVIF has an image resolution limit of 65536 x 65536 pixels. but from https://tonisagrista.com/blog/2023/jpegxl-vs-avif/ > Max image size is limited to 4K (3840x2160) in AVIF, which is a deal breaker to me. You can tile images, but seams are visible at the edges, > WebP also has a hard limit to an image's frame size, with its maximum dimension being 16,383 x 16,383 > We…

interesting, thank you for the links.

Re: A list of recent hostile moves by Google's Chrome team

#602

Post by mthoms » Mon, Aug 14, 2023, 2:26 PM UTC

SgtBaker wrote: post #599

mthoms wrote: post #598

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You explicitly said that move was a "privacy scam". Now you're backtracking to "just eroding trust". There's quite a gap there.

Learn to read. I said Brave was privacy scam. The whole company. Not just that move.

I can read fine.

1) You provided that example directly in response to the question "Can you show some sources for how Brave is scamming people out of privacy".

2) That example, I think we agree, is explicitly NOT "scamming people out of privacy".

You're wrong. It's okay though. Just acknowledge that you misspoke, clarify what you were trying to say, and move on. No need to be childish.

Post reply on HN