Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
narrowlink.com
Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
1–10 of 162 posts
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#2Don't forget Nebula[1].
[1] https://slack.engineering/introducing-nebula-the-open-source...
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#3This article is classic SEO fluff right? The Q&A style answering exactly the type of questions that people comparing the two would write into google search.
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#4Nebula is another option along these lines. https://nebula.defined.net/docs/ I've been using it for the better part of a year and am very happy with it. It is able to make point-to-point network connections in many situations, avoiding the out-and-back cost of VPN ingress/egress points that are far away from source and dest.
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#5> However, tailscale focuses on access different devices to each other, while Narrowlink focuses on access to the services trough on the agent as a proxy.
You can easily do the same thing with Tailscale: https://tailscale.com/kb/1019/subnets/.
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#6This article is classic SEO fluff right? The Q&A style answering exactly the type of questions that people comparing the two would write into google search.
how dare they try to answer questions people would type into google
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#7For people for which the SaaSiness of Tailscale would be the main deciding factor, it is important to note that this article completely fails to mention Headscale, a BSD-licenced tailscale-compatible coordination server under active development
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#8I'm using head scale. Is this a drop in replacement? Intrigued.
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#9This article is classic SEO fluff right? The Q&A style answering exactly the type of questions that people comparing the two would write into google search.
how dare they try to answer questions people would type into google
Ah I’m not negative about this here, its just notable and makes the article overly verbose.
Re: Tailscale vs. Narrowlink
#10This article is classic SEO fluff right? The Q&A style answering exactly the type of questions that people comparing the two would write into google search.
That's why the competitor's name is first in the title.