OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
1–10 of 137 posts
Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#2Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#3Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#4I'm curious if Pulumi is interested in this.
Yes we are competing in the same market; customers using Spacelift probably wont be using Digger and vice versa. But we feel like having a community-friendly fork would benefit everyone, without harming anyone.
Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#5I'm curious if Pulumi is interested in this.
Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#6Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#7Not a single vendor should own it all or even the majority.
Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#8Hashicorp switched Terraform from MPL to BSL yesterday. Many other companies did that in the past to prevent others taking their code and charging for running it as a managed service (eg Mongo, Elastic). With Hashi however, the server-side part was never open-source to start with. There was no such thing as "open-source Terraform Server". And now it seems that any commercial product that uses the Terraform language u…
Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#9Plenty of companies (including my employer) have been building fully monetized software using Consul and Vault under the hood and not paying them a dime. We're a company that's valued/market capped in the Billions btw and I know plenty of other large software companies doing the same thing.
Re: OpenTerraform – an MPL fork of Terraform after HashiCorp's license change
#10Well, can next Terraform successor be build by few vendors and community, not just a single one? Not a single vendor should own it all or even the majority.