Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know quite a few Linux users, and not all of them are computer nerds (and none of them use Arch or are part of some small niche group). I'd say about 1/3 of them use Gnome, 1/3 use KDE, and 1/3 use something other than those two. In general, it seems that those who are used to Windows get along better with KDE. > KDE should stop assisting with fragmenting Linux Having a selection of DEs to choose from is not "fragm…
The fragment part comes from KDE nor GNOME coming close to the efficiency of DWM and Windows Explorer. DWM and Explorer have low-latency, good hardware-acceleration, and power efficiency down to a T. GNOME 44 isn't on-par. I haven't heard anyone ever compliment KDE in these regards recently and back when I last tried it when Plasma 5 was relatively new it also wasn't up-to-par. More work should go towards making thes…
You lose transparency and animations, but the smoooooothness is amazing (and it even extends to games)!
I don't recall how smooth Windows 7 or Vista felt, but my conspiracy theory is that Windows lost all that Aero transparency IN ORDER to be so smooth (but that's probably apocryphal).
Nevertheless, Windows's DE and platform limitations are still horrible compared to Linux with KDE. :D As for Mac, that's tantamount to GNOME, so to me it's not worth considering as a contending GUI.