Live data from Hacker News

Compilation of claims/reports of LK-99 replication efforts

forums.spacebattles.com

301–303 of 303 posts

Re: Compilation of claims/reports of LK-99 replication efforts

#301
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They literally couldn’t get rich if they kept it out of everybody else’s hands.

Sure they could? That's a common way people get rich off of patents; make a product which uses your new innovation, sell that product, use the patent to prevent everyone else from using the innovation to make competing products. I believe that's more or less the history of e-ink, among other things.

> use the patent to prevent everyone else

> the history of e-ink

Could you give everyone here some verifiable data? Please identify what patent you're talking about. I hope I will get a genuine response from someone who genuinely knows that industry because the last time I asked I just got a patents.google.com/search?q=eink response. It is fun to blame patents. But that's like saying we're not making progress in operating systems because Microsoft owns a key patent in operating systems.

Re: Compilation of claims/reports of LK-99 replication efforts

#302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the lower the dimensionality, the harder it is to align pieces. For 3D material you could probably just grind your impure sample down into a powder, isolate the grains that levitate, and press them back together. That wouldn't preserve structures in 2D though, let alone 1D.

> I think the lower the dimensionality, the harder it is to align pieces. First, you’re not talking about synthesis anymore. And if you try to grow a single crystal, how easy it is to get polycrystals from powder is not really relevant. Ease to synthesise and ease to assemble are very different things and both are controlled by different phenomena. Also, again, not really. Graphene is quasi 2-dimensional and very eas…

there it is! enough arm-chair theorizing by computer "scientists", an actual material scientists! or condensed matter physicist, or crystallographic expert, or inorganic chemist...

Re: Compilation of claims/reports of LK-99 replication efforts

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

well, put a limit on how much profits you can make through patent. Like based on how much r&d was spent?

I'll just leave this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting

No system is flawless. As the article points, you can at least control and capture the biggest dishonest players.
Post reply on HN