Earlier quoted context omitted.
What evidence? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. They haven't even officially released their final version of the paper, and a whole bunch of people who don't have full access to their data being unable to replicate their material well enough to convince the world doesn't reflect at all on the validity of their work. If the people to whom they have submitted their paper, data, and samples can't replicat…
> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Actually it is when labs all around the world are trying to generate evidence and failing
Then the atom bomb was - for a time - disproven.