Live data from Hacker News

Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

syzito.xyz

31–40 of 241 posts

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#31

*Never build your house on someone else's land". Episode 237.

Kind of tired of this low effort canned reply. Unless you are the literal embodiment of a state, it's always someone else's land. You're just renting it as long as you pay taxes on it. Same goes digitally. Hosting is someone else's land. Domain name registration is someone else's land. Do you say the same thing when a piracy site loses it's domain and moves yet again to another obscure tld?

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#32
post #28

*Never build your house on someone else's land". Episode 237.

By that logic, Uber and Instagram and WhatsApp should not have been started, as the iOS App Store is unequivocally "someone else's land", and these services could only exist as native apps.

At this point it's all but inconceivable that those would be removed from the app servers, iOS or Android.

In the early days if something had gone wrong, it might have been a different story.

Though I suspect that companies with good VC connections might have side channels into Apple or Google to clear up problems.

Not like little guys who can wake up one morning to discover their $20K/month business is no more.

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#33
post #18

As pointed out in the comments he didn't have 11M followers. @music was renamed to @musicfan and @twittermusic was renamed to @music. Both accounts kept all of their followers.

So it is completely ok?

As any father says in any Hollywood movie: my house, my rules.

So... the 'thermostat' is theirs and theirs alone. You are just allowed to eat/sleep in your parents house. You're not entitled to anything in it.

Perhaps the $8 per month may give you some 'rights' but I'm sure the T&C give them the upper hand.

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#34
post #17

Meh. I think it's fine for them to take it, but they should have left a link up to his new account, and publicly thanked him for keeping an eye on this url for so long. Maybe throw in a 16 year credit towards free service or something. This just seems like a super easy opportunity to make fans. It reminds me of how Microsoft messed up with Mike Rowe soft at first.

[flagged]

Can we not keep spreading obvious propaganda about “child porn”? It’s completely and very obviously illegal to post such things. If anyone was posting it anywhere, on or off Twitter, they’re going to prison. Twitter deletes any such material, and always has, and reports people to the police. So there aren’t any known non-anonymous people out there publicly posting child porn to Twitter that lasts longer than an instant before it’s deleted, banned and reported to the police.

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#35

Meh. I think it's fine for them to take it, but they should have left a link up to his new account, and publicly thanked him for keeping an eye on this url for so long. Maybe throw in a 16 year credit towards free service or something. This just seems like a super easy opportunity to make fans. It reminds me of how Microsoft messed up with Mike Rowe soft at first.

Thought experiment:

Your business is located at 420 West 69th Street. Along comes X and takes that address away from you? Would you like that?

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#36
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same thing applies to Email, XMPP, Matrix, SIP, ActivityPub servers... nothing special about bluesky.

What is special about bluesky is that you don't have to host the service yourself (or pay a third party) for it to work.

Someone, somehow is paying for bluesky's servers and data. TANSTAAFL.

Google was running my email server with custom domain for years, free of charge. I think that it is still grandfathered in for those that signed for Google Apps early on. IT doesn't mean that the "email is free".

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hope the bank claim the money back from your account since you don't control or own their "platform".

What kind of comparison is this? In most modern countries, banking isn't a platform in the same sense that Twitter is, and despite large issues over the last few decades, they are still regulated by the government(s) they operate in.

[flagged]

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#39
post #35

Meh. I think it's fine for them to take it, but they should have left a link up to his new account, and publicly thanked him for keeping an eye on this url for so long. Maybe throw in a 16 year credit towards free service or something. This just seems like a super easy opportunity to make fans. It reminds me of how Microsoft messed up with Mike Rowe soft at first.

Thought experiment: Your business is located at 420 West 69th Street. Along comes X and takes that address away from you? Would you like that?

A "would you like something being taken away from you?" is not a thought experiment but a suggestion on what to think.

Secondly, I don't think this comparison with an address by a random stranger for no apparent reason is correct to begin with

Re: Jeremy Vaught spent 16 years to build @music on Twitter, then X took it away

#40
post #35

Meh. I think it's fine for them to take it, but they should have left a link up to his new account, and publicly thanked him for keeping an eye on this url for so long. Maybe throw in a 16 year credit towards free service or something. This just seems like a super easy opportunity to make fans. It reminds me of how Microsoft messed up with Mike Rowe soft at first.

Thought experiment: Your business is located at 420 West 69th Street. Along comes X and takes that address away from you? Would you like that?

Thought experiment:

Someone takes something* away from you. Would you like it?

*thing wasn't yours to begin with

Post reply on HN