Live data from Hacker News

After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com

31–40 of 142 posts

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#31
It is easy to disparage the Encyclopedia Britannica from a modern perspective - out-of-step, overpriced, outmaneuvered by competitors - but there is a great sadness here at the demise of something that represented an effort by western scholars to "capture the world's knowledge." Imagine assembling a "A" team of scholars and scientists, getting them to make substantial, substantive contributions in each of their respective areas of expertise, and publishing the results under the guidance of a top editorial board. The results echoed in the western world at the highest levels for no less than two centuries, culminating in a famous 1911 edition that was widely regarded as the pinnacle in assembled human knowledge to that time - something to be marveled at. For years, collectors paid a great premium to buy the 1911 edition, just for that reason. Even in the period leading up to the 1960s, the EB was a staple in most every western home where parents valued education and academic achievement for their kids. Whole hordes of door-to-door salesmen supported their families very comfortably just by selling this particular product.

So, yes, the EB became kind of laughable with its clumsy marketing efforts and awkward efforts to adapt to modern technology in the past couple of decades, but be kind to its memory. It was one of the great attempts in all history to try to do what many dream of doing today through the internet and the advantages of the digital age: limited by the resources of that day, for sure, but an amazing achievement nonetheless. There is something special that has died here and, if only for old time's sake, we can mourn its passing.

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#32
post #31

It is easy to disparage the Encyclopedia Britannica from a modern perspective - out-of-step, overpriced, outmaneuvered by competitors - but there is a great sadness here at the demise of something that represented an effort by western scholars to "capture the world's knowledge." Imagine assembling a "A" team of scholars and scientists, getting them to make substantial, substantive contributions in each of their respe…

I think you want another thread. If not, that's a very elliptical comment :-)

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#33
post #31

It is easy to disparage the Encyclopedia Britannica from a modern perspective - out-of-step, overpriced, outmaneuvered by competitors - but there is a great sadness here at the demise of something that represented an effort by western scholars to "capture the world's knowledge." Imagine assembling a "A" team of scholars and scientists, getting them to make substantial, substantive contributions in each of their respe…

Wrong thread perhaps? :)

(http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3700635)

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#34
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was huge value in thumbing through these as a child. We could never afford the set, but I had used copies of individual volumes and I spent many, many hours reading random topics. You just don't get that kind of discovery in an online version. Maybe you could, but you don't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random

Half the time, that leads to auto-generated stub articles about small towns in the middle of nowhere.

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#35

It's weird, but I kinda wouldn't mind having a set of the last Encyclopaedia Britannica. The zenith of 244 years of tradition, an emblem of the transition of our knowledge to an online space, and still very functional in a quaint way...

Yep, there goes $1500~

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#36
post #10
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The future is so clearly not britannica.com. That site doesn't even work without javascript, and where the heck is the "Edit" button?

Citable facts published by someone reputable are extremely important. Wikipedia is very much not that. britannica.com could very well be a citation for a wikipedia article but never the other way around.

I really don't think there is a place for traditional encyclopedias anymore, digital or hardcopy.

Of course we still want and need curated collections of information. But I fail to see the value of large collections of information that say a tiny bit about everything. I think the real value comes from knowledgable experts curating information about their niche. Which in my experience is not at all what traditional encyclopedias were (I'm 24).

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#37
post #13

$1,400 to buy it in book form. That may be part of the reason it's not being printed anymore.

32 volumes x ~$45 a piece. Seems to make sense. They're hard cover and very beautiful, can be used as a decorative piece as well.

The cost of a 2 million dollar yacht may also be justified, but that still explains why not more than a few thousand are sold a year.

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#38
It's interesting how gradual history can seem, even when we're in the middle of huge changes. Online sources of information just kept getting better, too slowly to really notice, and print encyclopedias seemed less and less relevant, but it wasn't until today that this really hit me. The Encyclopaedia Britannica is no longer being printed. That's kind of shocking, though in retrospect it seems almost inevitable.

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#39

$1,400 to buy it in book form. That may be part of the reason it's not being printed anymore.

I wonder if selling the most popular Wikipedia articles in printed form for around $100 would have a market.

It's already being done. I stumble across books like that in Amazon from time to time. The reviews usually give it away.

Re: After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses

#40
post #31

It is easy to disparage the Encyclopedia Britannica from a modern perspective - out-of-step, overpriced, outmaneuvered by competitors - but there is a great sadness here at the demise of something that represented an effort by western scholars to "capture the world's knowledge." Imagine assembling a "A" team of scholars and scientists, getting them to make substantial, substantive contributions in each of their respe…

Is this being upvoted?
Post reply on HN