Live data from Hacker News

A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

science.org

181–190 of 215 posts

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#181
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok, I'll tell my family that they should lay off the drugs and are just seeing things.

What, specifically, is your family seeing? So far there are some troops near the Polish border, and a possible helicopter incursion. There's not a lot that civilions could see unless they lived right on the border.

> possible helicopter incursion

It's not a possible. And yes there are people living 'right on the border'.

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#182
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There have been some incidents on the Polish border recently that put the whole thing on a knife edge.

No, that's just noise generated by the Russians and Belarus and then picked up by the press to make it sound dramatic. This is par for the course for Russian disinfo.

So the Belarus incursion that Belarus denies and the Polish publicly announced response are all Russian disinfo?

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First of all, the SO2 goes into the stratosphere , not the atmosphere. We know a lot about it because volcanoes do this occasionally. Temperatures cool down for about 2 years, which is how long it takes for the S02 to break down.

> First of all, the SO2 goes into the stratosphere, not the atmosphere. Considering that the stratosphere is part of the atmosphere, that's both pedantic and incorrect. > We know a lot about it because volcanoes do this occasionally. Temperatures cool down for about 2 years, which is how long it takes for the S02 to break down. Volcano's don't pump pure SO2. Yes, the science may be entirely valid, and it's not for me…

The distinction is important because at lower altitudes SO2 produces acid rain. But the stratosphere is far above the rain clouds.

NASA report on the Mount Pinatubo caused global cooling: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1510/global-effects...

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#185
post #183
post #172

The adaptability of cancer makes me think it's in fact a parasitic distributed lifeform, similar to fungus, that turns cells into zombies.

Cancer is your cells though, that's the problem.

Usually, yes. But there do exist infectious cancers that spread between individuals. One is the face cancer that's been killing Tasmanian devils[0]... it started in one individual and spreads to others when they fight (biting each other). Apparently there's a similar (although rarer) cancers that's sexually transmitted between dogs.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil_facial_tumour_disease

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#186

Martin Shkreli (yes, that Martin Shkreli) is currently running a virtual screen for additional PCNA inhibitors: https://twitter.com/wagieeacc/status/1687137621699436552

Can you explain what's going on there? Sounds like he's doing something to prevent patenting of drugs but I don't follow what it is.

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe? Really hard to say. We haven’t had any major advancements in planning, none of the current advances have done anything with memory (retrieval augmentation is a not very good hack and fine tuning doesn’t qualify for AGI), perception is getter better but still has a ways to go, we dont have any foundational multi-modal models that can extend to arbitrary new modalities like learning arbitrary new sensors, etc et…

Why is retivele a hack?

Because you’re grabbing stuff in some near by vector space and putting what can fit into context. This isn’t anywhere close to “intelligence.” You’re limited by context length, there’s no evolution or generalization, the vector space itself is just one facet of the problem, etc etc.

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Self consciousness. Human-level of reasoning. Feelings, etc. We are NOT close to AGI. * Fancy Markov chain (LLM) is not AGI. * Stable diffusion style of image generation is NOT AGI. * Fancy computer vision is NOT AGI. Honestly, I don't think we are any closer to AGI. What we are seeing is the peak of "fancy tricks" for computer generated artifacts.

Look carefully at these goals and tell me if these are materially falsifiable. Can you imagine a test that determines whether or not a system has self consciousness? If such a test exists we could interrogate if a system of some design might pass it, but if such a test does not exist and we cannot even imagine it then you’re talking about something that is unfalsifiable - which is another way of saying “effectively f…

Consciousness is not important for AGI. Being able to learn new skills, adapt to new sensors, transfer knowledge across domains, learn at all, plan, replan, achieve under specified goals and more are what’s required for AGI.

Plenty has been written about the requirements for decades now. That hasn’t changed.

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#189
post #172

The adaptability of cancer makes me think it's in fact a parasitic distributed lifeform, similar to fungus, that turns cells into zombies.

Isn't it more like dead cells that are being reawakened, switching to fermentation to create as much NAD+ as possible to grow as fast as possible?

Re: A New Mode of Cancer Treatment

#190
post #164

Am i the only one wondering what this finding really means in practice when we read every other weak a similiar science article that claims to be a breakthrough in cancer treatment?

Like solar cell and battery material discoveries, there is an ocean of problems to overcome before the promising results flow into a product. Potentially decades of problems to solve.
Post reply on HN