Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Magic Loops – Combine LLMs and code to create simple automations

magicloops.dev

31–40 of 53 posts

Re: Show HN: Magic Loops – Combine LLMs and code to create simple automations

#31
I asked it to make a shit post on r/askReddit every minute and it got an error

File "/home/glot/main.py", line 1 var BLOCK_INPUT = `"If you could instantly become an expert in any one subject, what would it be and why?"`; ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax

Re: Show HN: Magic Loops – Combine LLMs and code to create simple automations

#32

I asked it to make a shit post on r/askReddit every minute and it got an error File "/home/glot/main.py", line 1 var BLOCK_INPUT = `"If you could instantly become an expert in any one subject, what would it be and why?"`; ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax

Strange, that line appears to be correct JS. Have you tried regenerating the code?

Each block is editable, even if it doesn't seem so at first (including output!)

It's worth noting that this is not AutoGPT -- the initial generation is just a starting point, and that the actual loop configuration and validation is entirely within your control.

Re: Show HN: Magic Loops – Combine LLMs and code to create simple automations

#38
This all looks very cool! The generic API element is could be really useful as well and it seems like the LLM is pretty good at knowing some pretty common APIs. Would be really cool to run locally but could definitely see it as a business case as well. Way to go!

Will definitely play around with it more

Re: Show HN: Magic Loops – Combine LLMs and code to create simple automations

#40
post #21

Isn't GPT 4 very costly? Plus you're running a scraper. How do you plan to keep this free, or is this just a teaser? This may be useful but would love some clarity on how long you're gonna keep it like this.

Great question. Running GPT-4, the scraper, SMS, and email isn't free, so to keep the experiment going forever we would need to charge at some point. For those finding the service useful already: we're also thinking about open sourcing it so you can just run the loops yourself to keep costs down.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN