Live data from Hacker News

A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

science.org

441–450 of 821 posts

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#441
post #211
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everyone with half a brain in the US is working the ad-tech and data-mining industries, that's where the money is.

I suppose the researchers at Lawrence National Lab in Berkeley, whose analysis and pre-print replication effort is cited in the linked article, are working with, what, quarter-brains?

Pessimal, clearly those are the full, wrinkly brains.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#442
post #432
post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Batteries that don't take any time to recharge Huh? Is this actually a thing that this enables? I don't initially see how

Resistance is what makes things hot, and heat is what makes dumping huge amounts of charge current into batteries a bad idea. No resistance → no heat → no need to charge with low current†. Another way to say it is that, with a superconducting wire, you can make the wire as thin as you want and still pass the same amount of current through it, without melting the wire. Picture using a USB-C cable to charge your car. †…

Wouldn't the battery itself still have resistance? Or is the superconducting material itself a battery?

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#443

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about LK-99 coins!?!? Right? Maybe we use diffusion to design them so they are "super-conducting crypto AI coins" get yours now for only $199 at the Philadelphia Mint. Act now, supplies are limited!

I'm going to use my new skills as a Prompt Engineer to get Stable Diffusion to produce some NFTs for me, and use the profits to invest in a SPAC targeting LK-99 start-ups. Now explain that sentence to a caveman - or even to someone in 1990.

He is going to use his skills as a poweruser of an AI program to have it output a script; which runs an image generation program to produce and record sales transactions of images. He will take the money from the sales of those images to invest in a SPAC targeting potential room temperature super conductor start-ups.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#444
post #422

The ramifications of the inflection point we are currently at is mind boggling. I had a hard time explaining this last night but we may very well be witnessing the beginnings of a technological transformation era much like when the p-n junction was invented. From the 1940s standpoint it would be hard to envision all we had today. - Lossless transport of energy - Batteries that don't take any time to recharge - Faster…

> Batteries that don't take any time to recharge Huh? Is this actually a thing that this enables? I don't initially see how

It’s a zero resistance wire. Build a loop and pump electrons in. Need them back? Connect an off-ramp.

There are limits how much you can pump into it, it isn’t magic… but it almost is actually.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_ene...

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#445
post #165

I'm astounded that the MSM seems to be ignoring this ATM. I did a Google news search on LK-99 and saw nothing from major publications. A search on the NYTimes returned an article from 1974.

Most people I talk to don't recognize the importance of room temperature superconductivity. A floating grain is cool, but not something that jumps out at people like a rocket or a big fusion reactor. The application is similarly unintuitive. Many here on HN ask why such a thing would be important, and they are probably the 99th (or 99.9th?) percentile in materials science and EE literacy.

>Most people I talk to don't recognize the importance of room temperature superconductivity.

I don't. I read someone saying it would be the biggest breakthrough since fire. Is that true or hyperbole?

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#446
post #432
post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Batteries that don't take any time to recharge Huh? Is this actually a thing that this enables? I don't initially see how

Resistance is what makes things hot, and heat is what makes dumping huge amounts of charge current into batteries a bad idea. No resistance → no heat → no need to charge with low current†. Another way to say it is that, with a superconducting wire, you can make the wire as thin as you want and still pass the same amount of current through it, without melting the wire. Picture using a USB-C cable to charge your car. †…

Sure, it would make the wiring smaller and more efficient. But I also don't see how it would help in the chemical energy transfer to charge the battery.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#447

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Watch gold be the only practically viable solution, making this new material wonderful but also incredibly expensive.

Time to start mining asteroids.

Interestingly enough, there's already some idle speculation that the apparent variability of LK99 synthesis might be improved with zero-G manufacturing.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#448
post #432
post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Batteries that don't take any time to recharge Huh? Is this actually a thing that this enables? I don't initially see how

Resistance is what makes things hot, and heat is what makes dumping huge amounts of charge current into batteries a bad idea. No resistance → no heat → no need to charge with low current†. Another way to say it is that, with a superconducting wire, you can make the wire as thin as you want and still pass the same amount of current through it, without melting the wire. Picture using a USB-C cable to charge your car. †…

Superconductors also have an inherent current limit above which they go back to having a resistance.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#449

> They also predict that substituting gold atoms into the Pb(1) site could lead to a material with very similar properties, which will be an extremely interesting idea to put to the test. Since the base material is lead apatite, I had a random thought that maybe medieval alchemists trying to turn lead into gold just had it backward, as doping gold into lead might be a breakthrough. :-)

I want to believe. After several millennia of killing people for gold, we can finally put all that gold to good use—using it to create superconductors that can power energy weapons we can use to kill each other. ♫ It's the circle of life ♫

YOU IDIOT! W need the gold to turn the slaves back into carbon,m so we can make more slaves to harvest the gold!!* - https://youtu.be/rMz7JBRbmNo

--

I know we hate jokes - but apropos

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#450
post #432
post #422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Batteries that don't take any time to recharge Huh? Is this actually a thing that this enables? I don't initially see how

Resistance is what makes things hot, and heat is what makes dumping huge amounts of charge current into batteries a bad idea. No resistance → no heat → no need to charge with low current†. Another way to say it is that, with a superconducting wire, you can make the wire as thin as you want and still pass the same amount of current through it, without melting the wire. Picture using a USB-C cable to charge your car. †…

I’m not an expert on this, but I think superconducting wires have an current limit, as a current flowing creates a magnetic field which the superconductor has to repel. I read that the paper states a very low current limit for LK-99, meaning it loses superconductivity once a very modest amount of current is passed through it.
Post reply on HN