Earlier quoted context omitted.
To gather human intel you have to be willing to do things like drink in social situation and (gasp) sometimes do drugs with the people you're trying to collect intel from, to gain their friendship. In other words, you need to have a slightly adventurous personality.
Most people I know who have an adventurous personality don't smoke weed. Drinking I can see a case for as it's so heavily embedded as a social activity. Just anecdotal data I suppose but I'm not seeing a similar connection for having done drugs. Perhaps for someone who is undercover and needs to fit in, sure, but I don't think that predisposes a personality to take drugs in their own time. For both alcohol and drugs…
Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
61–70 of 266 posts
Re: Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
#62Marijuana (along with multi-lingualism) is a big reason why the Mormon-American community is significantly over-represented in the US intelligence community.
Re: Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
#63Marijuana use was mostly OK until Reagan came in. Then DISCO announced a policy change.
About marijuana activists, he said:
> I want a Goddamn strong statement on marijuana, I mean one that just tears the ass out of them. You know, its a funny thing, every one of the bastards that are out for legalizing marijuana is Jewish.
Re: Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
#64Democracies shouldn't have giant unaccountable spy orgs.
Re: Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
#65Re: Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
#66Marijuana (along with multi-lingualism) is a big reason why the Mormon-American community is significantly over-represented in the US intelligence community.
There are Mormons outside America?
Re: Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
#67Let me be the first to welcome people with more diverse substance abuse problems to our beloved secret police. My greatest regret is that I can only declare a mere hour of applause for their great personal sacrifices and worthily earned pensions. Tbh, I kind of liked the idea that decriminalization and liberal attitudes were starving them for talent.
Re: Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most people I know who have an adventurous personality don't smoke weed. Drinking I can see a case for as it's so heavily embedded as a social activity. Just anecdotal data I suppose but I'm not seeing a similar connection for having done drugs. Perhaps for someone who is undercover and needs to fit in, sure, but I don't think that predisposes a personality to take drugs in their own time. For both alcohol and drugs…
Yeah. And the people you network with in a HUMINT job aren't hanging around doing drugs for the most part. They are working in industry or government. Probably a fair amount of drinking but mostly no time for other drugs, or if they do them, keep it discreet.
Re: Senate votes to let people who’ve used marijuana work at intelligence agencies
#69You could already get a clearance with past marijuana use (and other drugs) but I guess this would just make it so someone couldn't be denied a clearance solely for that reason.
I got denied an internship at the CIA for my past drug use, which was entirely trying marijuana after it became legal in my home state. I don’t see how someone can possibly be expected to have the personality to gather (human) intel, but somehow not ever have smoked weed.