Live data from Hacker News

A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

science.org

131–140 of 821 posts

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#131
post #19

I still have a very, very hard time understanding what all of this means. Is there an easy to understand explanation for a room temperature superconductor?

It's a conductor of electricity. But super good at it. i.e. - It has zero resistance to electricity. Currently, the best superconducting materials we can create have to be chilled to near absolute zero, which means designing them to work in liquid helium baths. This is expensive, and difficult. If a material can superconduct at room temperature, now we're talking usage in general purpose consumer goods. As for why we…

I imagine that carbon footprint could be reduced substantially by this too, at least on a per-watt of utilized energy basis. Imagine if all computer chips used semiconductor materials - then more of the input electricity is actually put towards computing, and cooling fans are a thing of the past!

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#132
post #19

I still have a very, very hard time understanding what all of this means. Is there an easy to understand explanation for a room temperature superconductor?

[flagged]

HN tends to be a place where many technical experts explain complicated things succinctly because they know the audience here has a certain baseline of knowledge. I scrolled down until I found this question (as I have the same "huh, what is this anyway?" reaction).

Because I'm a "Very Busy Person" and don't actually have all day to screw around with "every YouTube video", I come to HN to optimize my time spend/information gained ratio.

Likewise, on this topic, even the above is still confusing. People say it's more efficient, then replies say we're already at 95-99% efficiency so it doesn't matter much. I'm still fairly confused!

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#133

Mostly, I am just glad that all the LK-99 posts are drowning out the "AI" news for a few days.

This is going to turn into the Iran Contra affair all over again.

Get tired of one set of assholes? Funnel resources to another set of assholes (who also wish you harm).

If this turns out to be actually true then everyone will want to talk about fusion again. I don't know if I have the stomach for it. But as you say, at least it's not AI.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#134

Mostly, I am just glad that all the LK-99 posts are drowning out the "AI" news for a few days.

Anything is better than crypto.

How about LK-99 coins!?!? Right? Maybe we use diffusion to design them so they are "super-conducting crypto AI coins" get yours now for only $199 at the Philadelphia Mint. Act now, supplies are limited!

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#136

Mostly, I am just glad that all the LK-99 posts are drowning out the "AI" news for a few days.

Anything is better than crypto.

Crypto is utterly useless, a walled off sector of cons.

AI is useful enough to be dangerous in the hands of bad actors, where the marks are not just the suckers but the people who want to have nothing to do with it.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#137

With all the recent “the government has alien spacecraft news” and the bizarre circumstances of this material’s creation, the (I know to be ridiculous) conspiratorial part of my mind is going “I guess climate change is finally forcing them to take stuff out of the extraterrestrial vaults.”

I want to believe.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are they all from China? Why are they able to replicate so much faster than US labs?

They have a lot of labs, and materials sourcing is easier for them. That’s partially because China is the origin of lots of stuff, and partly because the US regulated red phosphorus as a meth precursor.

Additionally, it appears some of the original team members were concerned about possible industrial spying or leaks and that 'other parties' might be moving to replicate which was part of the impetus for rushing to publish. So, it's possible that some team(s) in China may have already been starting, underway or at least thinking about it.

Re: A room-temperature superconductor? New developments

#139
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[not an expert but...]It shows strong diamagnetism(being repelled by both of the poles of a magnet), which is a property of superconductors. Not necessarily a superconductor though, that’s still to be established but at least it shows that the inventors are up to something and it’s not complete fabrication.

Why don’t they try heating it and seeing if the effect goes away? You could even try a welding torch or something.

There are better, less destructive ways to test the transition temperature. Apparently LK-99 is hard to make in bulk, so they probably don't want to torch their sample.
Post reply on HN