Live data from Hacker News

Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

paulgraham.com

401–410 of 437 posts

Re: Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

#401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"We will have to find some sort of tax system that makes it possible for those who can't participate in the elite to also live their lives" Rather than a tax system that gives them pretty much no incentive to get a job (if you were essentially paid to do whatever you wanted to do, would you want to get a job?), it would probably be better to have government enforced jobs (IE: you want money from the government, you n…

You're line of reasoning is way off base. You're trying to shoehorn a scarcity-based economy into a post-scarcity society. The idea of "contributing" (the way its currently thought of) will have to go away completely. Private ownership is a social construct. In a post-scarcity world our ideas of private ownership will have to change. Society will simply not allow the owner of Acme robot company to literally own every…

Unless the robots have guns...

Re: Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

#402
post #382

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you can solve that problem, you have will have done the world an amazing service, outperforming even Norman Borlaug, and the idea is certainly ambitious in its scope. One question though: how would you go about doing it?

Let's study history and see how Europe and America got wealthy and try to do that.

Which lands and populations do you suggest Africans raid for resources and labour?

Re: Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

#404

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bloated frameworks, and software with many layers (some quite unnecessary) were facilitated by increasing clock-speeds - but at least it's possible to get rid of them. Also, work has been done on JS JIT compilation. Server languages are getting faster too. It's instructive to note how much more compact alternative operating systems have been made compared to the mainstream ones. Full fledged BeOS systems used to weig…

Today the OS has to support way, way more different hardware than BeOS and Symbolics ever had to. BeOS made their own boxes right? Symbolics certainly did and I doubt they had a TCP/IP stack build in....

Be did initially make BeBoxes, but BeOS later ran on off-the-shelf x86 hardware (provided it had drivers, of course, but basic graphics worked on pretty much anything of the era). BeOS R5 at least also had a TCP/IP stack, and while it wasn't highly regarded (Be was rewriting it when it went under) it more or less worked.

By this argument, OS X should be a lot lighter than Windows, which it isn't.

Re: Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

#405
post #400

How do you "just say you're building todo-list software" and not get laughed out of the room? Investors say the space is too crowded, and engineers joke about it being one of their first classroom assignments. And even if you're making traction on the vision to replace the inbox, Y-Combinator's partners will turn you down.

Good reason not to depend on VC funding

Re: Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

#406
post #276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Facebook and Google have improved the daily lives of billions of people. Tesla Motors' electric car? Very impressive and a lot of promise, but so far all it's done is increase the self-satisfaction of ~1000 people. Look at Star Trek. Other than the spaceship itself the most impressive things are the technology the people use. The Siri-like computer interface, iPad-like computers, Skype-like communications technology,…

Facebook and Google have improved the daily lives of billions of people. Tesla Motors' electric car? Very impressive and a lot of promise, but so far all it's done is increase the self-satisfaction of ~1000 people. The same could be told about computer in the 1950's, I am talking about the famous misquote : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_J._Watson#Famous_misquot... there was a world market for maybe five compute…

> If fossil fuels aren't going drive cars in the future its going to be something else.

The other option is we won't have cars.

Re: Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

#407
post #160
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> for many people it's just a receipt box There's a good startup idea right there! Sign up on receiptbox.com and give it my email username/password (or maybe some sort of oauth token). It periodically scans my email and looks for receipt emails from well known e-commerce sites. It knows how to parse them and pull out the relavent details (like TripIt does for travel stuff) and it builds a builds a nice searchable cat…

Give a third party my password so it can scan my email for financial data? No thanks. I realise there are people who would love this convenience, and you'd make a killing on targeted ads, but this is a privacy nightmare. Good luck getting people to trust you. Furthermore, you really want the results of the filtering to be applied in the user's own mail client rather than having a separate UI.. Might be feasible as a…

Re: the first part, I'm reminded of this web application called Mint.com...

Re: Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

#408
post #245

Guys, please do something which will replace Word and Excel. These tools were good in the '80 and '90. One of the main reasons I do not like to work for corporations is Word doc attachments hell.

On the other hand, I'm sure you'll love the Word Replacement attachment hell.

It's not the tools that need replacing here, it's the process.

Re: Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas

#409
post #348

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whether you find "they" as a third person singular pronoun objectionable, it's not "new"--it goes back to at least Shakespeare (through Austen).

I object to: - the idea that changing grammar is a way to fix moral problems. - any barrier, taboo, or artificial distance between what one think and what one write.

I agree - we should get more people to think in singular they, rather than just write.
Post reply on HN