Live data from Hacker News

Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

pyvideo.org

21–30 of 50 posts

Re: Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

#21
post #8

I don't mean to be harsh but after reading the article I couldn't listen to the "Uhhh Ehmmmm"s anymore. Was he just reading the transcript to the guys? A keynote should be without any "uhh"s and "ehmmm"s otherwise you will not get audience IMO.

'what HN users don't mean to be:' http://www.hnsearch.com/search#request/all&q=%22I+don%27...

"English to nerd translation":

http://www.whattofix.com/blog/archives/2012/03/nerd-to-engli...

Re: Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

#22
post #20

Question for pg: There is probably an essay there, too bad I don't write them anymore (43.30 in video, regarding "moral compass outsourcing") Have you stopped writing essays? Does that mean you're shifting your focus to YC 100% or going back to work on arc again? Or are you talking about non-startup essays?

Actually I just wrote the first draft of one of the essays I said during that talk I should write.

Writing essays depends on having uninterrupted blocks of time. Between kids and the growth of YC I don't have as many of those as I used to. I should try to arrange things so I have more.

Re: Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

#23
post #22
post #20

Question for pg: There is probably an essay there, too bad I don't write them anymore (43.30 in video, regarding "moral compass outsourcing") Have you stopped writing essays? Does that mean you're shifting your focus to YC 100% or going back to work on arc again? Or are you talking about non-startup essays?

Actually I just wrote the first draft of one of the essays I said during that talk I should write. Writing essays depends on having uninterrupted blocks of time. Between kids and the growth of YC I don't have as many of those as I used to. I should try to arrange things so I have more.

Evidentially there is time to be had if you quit reading your email. I really enjoyed the talk. Thanks for coming out

Re: Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

#24
When talking about the Apple killer pg states two things.

1. The next product visionary will have a great example in Jobs and Apple. 2. The next Apple probably won't start with a consumer product, but they might be able to make some consumer thingy like Jawbone does.

Nest creates a great consumer thingy that's relatively cheap and it's run by an ex Apple employee. Tony Fadell might say he's not pursuing Apple's business, but is it unreasonable to think he might when the Apple pirate ship starts sinking?

Re: Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

#25
post #8

I don't mean to be harsh but after reading the article I couldn't listen to the "Uhhh Ehmmmm"s anymore. Was he just reading the transcript to the guys? A keynote should be without any "uhh"s and "ehmmm"s otherwise you will not get audience IMO.

Sounded like he's about take take a feace

Re: Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

#27
post #23
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually I just wrote the first draft of one of the essays I said during that talk I should write. Writing essays depends on having uninterrupted blocks of time. Between kids and the growth of YC I don't have as many of those as I used to. I should try to arrange things so I have more.

Evidentially there is time to be had if you quit reading your email. I really enjoyed the talk. Thanks for coming out

[deleted]

Re: Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

#29

When talking about the Apple killer pg states two things. 1. The next product visionary will have a great example in Jobs and Apple. 2. The next Apple probably won't start with a consumer product, but they might be able to make some consumer thingy like Jawbone does. Nest creates a great consumer thingy that's relatively cheap and it's run by an ex Apple employee. Tony Fadell might say he's not pursuing Apple's busin…

Nest is certainly one of the leading candidates, as far as one could tell this early. A thermostat is exactly the right sort of apparently harmless thing to start with.

Re: Paul Graham PyCon 2012 keynote

#30
I enjoyed the talk and admired his good use of clarity when talking about the problems. However, the counter to clarity is that it might be a bit too clean for the real world, and that was apparent when answering the questions about copyright at the end.

I realize that pg wasn't particularly prepared to be dealing with questions unrelated to the talk, but it was the first time I've seen him not easily handle questions with grace. His responses came off as glib and eventually he had to qualify and edit his previous statements to provide somewhat of a satisfactory response.

It's easy to over-believe ideas that are put forth with clarity and match your natural disposition towards clean logic and historical examples. Though pg has intriguing and useful perspectives, I encourage people to study these problems far more in-depth before forming a personal opinion.

On a somewhat related note, it was alarming that pg didn't have a clear moral position when asked about his decision-making process. It's fine for the young and uninfluential to "wing it" when it comes to moral decision-making, but seems irresponsible for someone with his level of power in Silicon Valley.

Post reply on HN