Live data from Hacker News

Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

reuters.com

731–740 of 769 posts

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#731

I'm surprised by the reaction to this article. 1. The range is set by the EPA. They are the ones that do the testing and validate the claims. The EPA should fix their range guidelines for EVs. Maybe a summer and winter range would be more appropriate? 2. Tesla should have a better UI for range, but really they should just show the percentage. Acting like it is a conspiracy is a bit extreme. They are just doing EPA Ra…

> “We’re looking at the range, and you literally see the number decrease in front of your eyes,” he said of his dashboard range meter. From the third paragraph

What a silly quote. The same happens to me in my ICE car. As I'm driving along the estimated range keeps decreasing. Because that's the whole point.

I'm confused how anyone thinks it should do otherwise.

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#732

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does any of this have to do with the fact that Tesla is lying to its customers and the other EV manufacturers are not.

Who says that they're not? Seems all the attention is on Tesla because of a certain someone... In any case telling customers EPA numbers shouldn't be considered a lie.

Polestar does the exact same thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3P32TyLMMM&t=644s

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#733

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Battery tech has changed a lot since 2008.

I don't think so, cold and cycle degradation still impact range the same. Maybe battery heaters?

2008 was 15 years ago. Look up lithium iron phosphate batteries.

Also the worst wear comes from charging while cold. If a charger is plugged in it can heat the batteries before charging them.

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#734

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah - it's pretty wild, Tesla really committed to this a decade ago and has been chipping away at it since, the investment paid off. Even better, strategically Tesla created the "NACS" or North American Charging Standard which is a clever name for their far superior Tesla charger. They also pivoted from the superchargers being an exclusive reason to buy a Tesla to licensing them for other EVs - now Ford is onboard,…

Can you explain why other manufacturers switching to NACS is advantageous to Tesla? Are they collecting fees or is there some reason bp or Shell or Exxon couldn’t just add NACS chargers to all their real estate and steal share from Superchargers? I have yet to see any explanation as to how the switch to NACS is actually good for Tesla, other than testimony to the standard design being better than CCS?

It's good for Tesla customers because it means NACS charging infrastructure will be more widely available from more companies. Tesla will have reason (and economic motive) to add more Supercharger sites and make them larger than they'd otherwise be.

It's good for Tesla because it costs them a lot less to have everyone else shift to NACS than for them to redeploy ten thousand Supercharger stalls with CCS1.

Honestly the only losers in the continental shift to NACS are those with significant existing CCS1 investments, like Electrify America. And I don't see why they deserve any sympathy from the likes of Ford and GM. The poor reliability of many CCS1 networks has been an albatross around the neck of Tesla's competitors.

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#735
post #29

Giving optimistic estimates based on generalized vehicle information, then giving more precise estimates after the 50% mark—and after having collected usage information based on the user’s actual environment—sounds to me like a decent algorithmic solution to a hard problem.

It sounds like a terrible solution to an easy problem. And calling it an "algorithmic solution" is being generous, considering that our dead simple decade old Mazda 2 gives us a closer than 25% range estimate just based on the mpg for the previous X number of miles driven. That's not an algorithm, that is a simple math calculation with only two inputs; gas consumption rate and miles driven. Tesla, with thousands of d…

Tesla vehicles do provide an accurate estimate. The estimates provided when you navigate to your destination are usually within 1-2% of correct, and take into account road speed, elevation changes, regenerative braking, wind direction, etc.

Like many EVs, the "fuel gauge" number is based on the EPA estimate and the navigation range is based on accurate predictions. It's like this in the Polestar too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3P32TyLMMM&t=644s

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#737
post #647

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Consumer Reports and others have found that most of the "issues" reported with EVs in these rankings are software glitches , often solvable with a reboot or an over-the-air software update: https://www.greencars.com/expert-insights/are-electric-cars-... Those findings are consistent with my experience.

“The organization also found that Tesla, which is often lauded for its sophisticated technology, was not a paragon of reliability, ranking dead-last among brands”

New survey by Bloomberg (published today!) finds Tesla's five-year reliability to be exceptional: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-tesla-survey/model-3... (https://archive.li/rkT9X)

Consistent with my experience.

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#738

I have a model Y. I hate almost everything about it. But most germane, The "Battery meter" at the top of the display is total bunk. That's got to be "rosy" numbers. It'll display a the battery in miles, but it's at least 25% inflated. However if you punch in a destination, you'll get exact numbers, and those are insanely reliable. It claims (and I don't believe any claims coming from tesla) that it'll factor wind, el…

This is my experience too. If you plan your trip, it’s really good about predicting the % battery remaining. I never put it on miles display anymore; that’s evidently going to be inaccurate because it doesn’t take into account many other factors. But if I enter in a route, now it actually has something to go on and can do a good job.

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#739
post #588

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your second sentence is correct, but it takes a lot more torque to turn a generator at a given speed when it is driving current through a load, than it does when it is open-circuit. Inside the motor/generator, what happens is that if there's current flowing in the windings as a result of the EMF induced by turning the rotor, then, loosely speaking, it creates a magnetic field which opposes the rotation - but if it is…

Correct me if I'm wrong but, if I understand things correctly... at this point we're wondering if manual locking hubs are a better (or worse) solution than electrically isolating the motor(s). Right? And, off the top of my head I'm going to say the manual locking hubs will be better overall. Better from an energy efficiency perspective as well as overall convenience and simplicity of design. They might be worse for T…

I don't think it would be useful for me to speculate about that. I'm just attempting to clear up some apparent misunderstandings about regenerative braking.

Re: Tesla created secret team to suppress thousands of driving range complaints

#740
post #439
post #392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the same problem as displaying the battery percentage on your phone. you're more inclined to look at it, and will be more anxious when that number drops. I wish Tesla would allow you to hide the battery percentage entirely (unless it drops below a threshold).

Huh? Do you constantly stare at a car gas gauge too? Battery level is important information for planning your usage, with both phones and cars.

Yeah, when it's low!
Post reply on HN