Live data from Hacker News

Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

scanalyst.fourmilab.ch

151–160 of 362 posts

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#151
The major threads so far:

Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36881808 - July 2023 (434 comments)

The first room-temperature ambient-pressure superconductor? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624 - July 2023 (858 comments)

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#152
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's unlikely in this case. They seem to have gone out of their way to show a method that can achieve replication using very common materials and pretty much medieval-grade technology (except for the vacuum pump, maybe).

Ok, if that's the case, why the imperfect demonstration? Why not dozens and dozens of videos showing such a monumental success in action? The lack of clear evidence, especially with social media frenzies, is a red flag in my opinion.

It looks like they rushed to publish, trying to get their name out first.

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#153
post #63
post #6

"this may spark a revolution in electronics as significant as the invention of the transistor, vacuum tube, and induction motor." How, exactly?

Superconductors are in the name. They're ideal conductors. As a corollary, superconductors coiled into a wire, shaped like an inductor, are also ideal inductors. By ideal, I informally mean nearly perfect in a mathematical sense. A thin superconductor can carry an almost arbitrary amount of electricity with 0% loss. This is a real-world application already for superconductors, but it requires cooling the entire condu…

> Similarly, an inductor made out of a superconductor, that is looped back on itself, can hold a magnetic field indefinitely, with 0% loss. Energy storage.

Could this be used to make a bomb?

If the new material really is as easy to manufacture as it seems, could homegrown terrorists easily create WMDs?

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People were arguing about this earlier (some claimimg the opposite) but I didn't see a conclusion. Do you have an external citation handy?

I was one of the people who said power is wasted in wires. When the charged stored inside a chip needs to change (like go from high to low), that energy associated with the charge needs to go somewhere. Currently most of the charge is dissipated in the wire and some of it within the transistor. If the wires have no resistance, the transistor will be the one dissipating the energy, not the energy simply disappears. So…

Ahh right. I didn't think of that. Thank you for explaining.

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#155
post #7

Just for fun: Am I the only one who thinks there's connection between this and the UAP news that's coming out? RTSC would probably enable a lot of incredible energy & maneuverability capabilities... Sorry, indulging in a little off-topic conspiracy theorizing.

We've known about superconductivity since 1911. For the sake of argument that Mussolini's UFO showed the way to "better" implementations of superconductivity, it wouldn't have taken this long if someone wanted to gradually leak it out, so I do think we did this all on our own.

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#156
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Someone posted a ChatGPT answer, which seems a pretty good response: Energy Efficiency: Superconductors conduct electricity without resistance, which means they don't produce heat as a byproduct. This could make electronic devices more energy-efficient and help them run cooler, which could extend battery life in mobile devices and potentially reduce the need for cooling in larger devices like computers. Processing Sp…

Asking the AI in my pocket what the new superconductor technology can do for society. We’re kinda in the future, and that’s neat.

With apologies for being the pedantic person, you're not really asking the AI in your pocket. You're just using the web browser on your pocket computer to compose a message to the massive AI system running in some datacenter somewhere.

Ironically, if this problem does get solved, you could have the whole AI system in your pocket.

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#157
post #7

Just for fun: Am I the only one who thinks there's connection between this and the UAP news that's coming out? RTSC would probably enable a lot of incredible energy & maneuverability capabilities... Sorry, indulging in a little off-topic conspiracy theorizing.

David Grusch is literally talking heresay with zero first hand accounts. Heresay is not allowed in courts for a reason. Snowden blew the lid off an international conspiracy, and he had gigabytes of receipts.

Grusch has talked to people who work in information constrained spaces working on advanced materials with fancy codenames. If he was able to give literally any proof besides words coming out of his mouth and "trust me bro, they could be interdimensional", I would give him some credence, but there is nothing.

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#159
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you summarize his position? Can't see X posts without a login.

He’s just some guy at an aerospace startup who is trying to make some lol. Problem with his approach is that the synthesis requires some materials that are restricted to academic/scientific labs (like red phosphorus), so he’s probably not going to be first to replicate.

Looks like he found a lab willing to hook him up. https://twitter.com/thedanaddison/status/1684587778959618048...

Re: Room temperature, ambient pressure superconductivity – this time for real?

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People were arguing about this earlier (some claimimg the opposite) but I didn't see a conclusion. Do you have an external citation handy?

Citation: thermodynamics. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer%27s_principle

I get it now. Thanks.
Post reply on HN