Live data from Hacker News

Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

science.org

161–170 of 501 posts

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#161
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This would only solve one of the more minor problems with fusion. And what would it do for batteries?

I wonder if it would really mean a different sort of battery maybe like a super capacitor that doesn't discharge.

[deleted]

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's nothing about bicycles in the video he linked.

A classic Freudian clip.

Amazing choice of word. Always check your clipboard links before pushing send.

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#163
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

e.g. What keeps bicycles balanced with or without a rider is still an active area of research, and even the seemingly basic idea that, for a bicycle to be self-stable, it needs to turn the handlebars into the fall, has not yet been proven. [*] https://ciechanow.ski/bicycle/

"Active area of research" is quite different to "we don't know how they work". We know how they work. We might not have fully characterised the stability conditions , but that's not the same thing.

Cmon, man

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn't. Permanent magnets would be unstable. This would have to be a diamagnetic or superconducting material.

It is, depending on how big the contact patch is. But does look pretty small in this video and it doesn't really behave like a permanent magnet would.

[deleted]

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#165
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Has there been any commentary on that? German, but nevertheless: http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=9a3f8740 "I work in the field [...] we don't believe a word of this. [...] The data set in Fig. 4(b) is also a treat. It is VERY unusual when the heat capacity decreases again at high temperatures. This can happen at low temperatures, but not at high temperatures. [...] My personal assumption is that the authors measured an ins…

Wow, that's pretty damning. Good one.

“Damning” is the wrong word here. “Damning” would be “oh, look, the researchers forgot that the plot showing zero voltage also shows current dropping to zero. They’re clearly measuring a bad contact.”

But the papers don’t show that. There’s no obvious contradiction unless you make some big assumptions.

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#166
post #137

New scientist got a reply from the authors and a few other experts: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2384782-room-temperatur... >Kim has only co-authored one of the arXiv papers, while the other is authored by his colleagues at the Quantum Energy Research Centre in South Korea, some of whom also applied for a patent on LK-99 in August 2022. >Both papers present similar measurements, however Kim says that the seco…

“Both papers present similar measurements”

I’m not a physicist expert of superconductors, although I’ve followed quite closely that field since the ‘90s. But if the measurements are similar and correct and if the video of lk-99 levitating above a magnet demonstrating the Meissner effect is not fake, I don’t really have an alternative explanation to account for all of that. I guess that we’ll see what happens in the next week or two. This is too high stakes to take longer than that for a so easily reproducible experiment.

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#167

"this stuff is claimed to superconduct all the way up to room temperature and indeed up past the boiling point of water. Its critical temperature is said to be 127C" Would this have implications about possible efficient methods of converting heat back into electricity? Or even just more ways of harnessing heat energy in general. I'm imagining heat pumps built with superconductors could be a critical part of mitigatin…

No, it just means that the material conducts electricity without losing almost any energy through heat at that critical temperature. Heat itself is a process of energy transfer (heat itself is not energy which many people fail to recognize if they haven't studied thermodynamics thoroughly).

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#168

So what kinds of cool stuff could be built with a room temperature superconductor? Better levitating trains?

Nuclear fusion much easier, quantum computing, lossless electricity transmission, insane batteries. Dirt cheap MRIs, Basically welcome to the Jetsons. Much easier to mitigate climate change to the point where we can just deal with it.

How would this make climate change easier to deal with? Because it would make everything that much more efficient? I'm honestly trying to understand the implications.

Re: Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be

#169
I see a few comments saying this can also be used to "solve" climate change, but I am trying to understand the how. Do people mean that the world will have less carbon footprint overall because everything will be much more efficient?
Post reply on HN