‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
1–10 of 133 posts
Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#2Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#3Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#4Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#5[flagged]
Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#6though I think that to keep up with the scale, maybe I should call it "publishing institution" (alongside, government institutions, organized crime institutions (arguably blended with the government in some places), industrial institutions, and merchant institutions like banks)
so then, journalism was the first to be redrawn by the internet technology when tech companies became the biggest advertisers in the world. then music, even 'BIG entertainment' is on strike.
and now academia is having its moment, and so many things are unraveling as well
Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#7[flagged]
All Academics have to perform, and all Corporate Drones have to perform, all middle managers.
Everyone is under pressure to achieve or die, and if you are starving, the temptation to fake it is great.
(or dump chemical waste, or fake emissions data like VW, etc... etc...)
MOLOCH strikes back.
Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#8interesting timing with this hitting the front page yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624
Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#9Re: ‘A very disturbing picture’: another retraction for controversial physicist
#10However, what is the societal problem here? It's the problem that in academia, there are such pressures to publish and be first nowadays that many people will do anything to get ahead. It doesn't help that social media and news sites have introduced a sort of gamification into it.
People have their natures, and the current state of academia encourages cheating, plain and simple. Just like the current state of finance encourages market manipulation.
If we want to fix it, simply outing these fakes will not be enough. While I don't have much sympathy for the cheaters, I also don't have much sympathy for the scientific community that has created this environment.