21–30 of 486 posts
Projects like these existed, I think it was an extension, but we'd probably need to do better than that.
Blaming the engineers themselves?
It will be hard to beat any AR level ad filtering. Ultimately AI will make ad avoidance easier rather than harder.
Waving that don't be evil flag proudly eh team.
I hate ads as much as anyone but providing a free service that runs ads and shares part of that income with content creators is hardly particularly evil.
And if you happen to be a tech giant that can drive the industry literally to every direction you want for decades, and what you choose to innovate is ad tech and NOTHING else, you're not evil, just stupid. Well maybe both. Or either. But definitely stupid.
Waving that don't be evil flag proudly eh team.
I hate ads as much as anyone but providing a free service that runs ads and shares part of that income with content creators is hardly particularly evil.
We have all seen that there are absolutely no boundaries on how many adds and pop-ups sites get plastered with.
They aren't trying to balance it out on their sites, they just try to make as much money as possible. That isn't an acceptable user experience.
Now pair that with the world's most used search engine rewarding the most amount of (their) adds. It is a hellscape.
> Detect non-human traffic in advertising to improve user experience and access to web content
As if the goal to do that would be improving UX...
Waving that don't be evil flag proudly eh team.
I hate ads as much as anyone but providing a free service that runs ads and shares part of that income with content creators is hardly particularly evil.
I’m watching a video about cars, sure show me the ad about this crappy car brand I will never buy. I’m reading an article about Prometheus, sure show me an ad about your greatest SaaS metrics platform that cost more per monitored machine than my machine.
No needs for cookies and tracking.
> However, how this plays out with browsers that allow extensions or are modified remains a grey area. As the proposal vaguely mentions, "Web Environment Integrity attests the legitimacy of the underlying hardware and software stack, it does not restrict the indicated application’s functionality."
That's not vague at all.