A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
lunduke.locals.com
A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#2I honestly would have assumed it was more a product of the decline in quality of the platform. AI growth just seems to be "capitalizing" on it.
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#3A sequence of things happened with AI that got broadcasted wide enough that the author would have found it if they looked:
1. Tons of submissions from ChatGPT started popping up as users tried to get points the easy way.
2. Moderators began auto banning AI posts as low effort in an attempt to stem the tide.
3. StackOverflow fearing what the author proposes pushed back and forced moderators to stop auto banning AI content and instead only action incorrect answers.
4. Moderators revolted due to the huge effort required to sift through AI generated content to figure out what is worthwhile
I don't know if the moderator actions led to any action from StackOverflow but going to StackOverflow when all questions are filled in by ChatGPT is 100% pointless.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a33dj/stack-overflow-modera...
Note of course if the site isn't then StackOverflow can still provide value given the inability to know when AI is hallucinating.
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#4Are people really able to replace most of what they'd find on SO with chatGPT queries? I find most of the stuff I need help with comes in the form of modern libraries (eg next.js) and finicky configs.
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#5I honestly would have assumed it was more a product of the decline in quality of the platform. AI growth just seems to be "capitalizing" on it.
[deleted]
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#6A sequence of things happened with AI that got broadcasted wide enough that the author would have found it if they looked: 1. Tons of submissions from ChatGPT started popping up as users tried to get points the easy way. 2. Moderators began auto banning AI posts as low effort in an attempt to stem the tide. 3. StackOverflow fearing what the author proposes pushed back and forced moderators to stop auto banning AI con…
> Moderators began auto banning AI posts
How was this achieved?
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#7Vitriol from the moderators & members over there is to blame + attitude over automatic answers from documentation using LLMs
GitHub issues is actually a better place to hope & find answers from people who's code you actually use instead of SO. The only time I go to SO is for obscure Linux/she'll command info
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#8Vitriol from the moderators & members over there is to blame + attitude over automatic answers from documentation using LLMs GitHub issues is actually a better place to hope & find answers from people who's code you actually use instead of SO. The only time I go to SO is for obscure Linux/she'll command info
GitHub issues is the worst place to find answers. You have to read through walls of comments to figure something out. Maybe not on smaller projects but eg Kubernetes issues suffers from the same problem that we had internally at GitHub. Unless the team prioritized summary messages, you were left reading through hundreds of comments to figure out how a solution was found.
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#9Stack Exchange has also had a lot of other problems around the same time. They have increasingly treated their creators poorly over the recent years.
Re: A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
#10Clickbait. And related https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36855516