Live data from Hacker News

The Fall of Stack Overflow

observablehq.com

111–120 of 808 posts

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#111
post #106
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It has for me, and several developer friends, and considering the fame ChatGPT has gotten, and that StackOverflow's fall has accelerated, it's obvious the milkshake's migrating. Not all of it of course, as I stated, "for the common use case"

To contrast, I've not once used it where I would have previously used SO (professional developer).

Have you tried to use it?

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#112
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Even though StackOverflow in the common use case has been taken over by ChatGPT Claim asserted without evidence.

It has for me, and several developer friends, and considering the fame ChatGPT has gotten, and that StackOverflow's fall has accelerated, it's obvious the milkshake's migrating. Not all of it of course, as I stated, "for the common use case"

Yes I spend far less time reading stack overflow answers now that I have GPT4.

However GPT4 is occasionally still inadequate so I certainly hope SO sticks around, it is a tremendous resource.

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#113
post #6

I think the problem is google losing the fight with spammers. It's being a while for me that I have to put "stackoverflow" in the search query to avoid sites with scraped content

What’s interesting is that Google was known for how hard it was to figure out the Google algorithm. Remember, when people were hired because they knew the secret sauce on how to get the best Google ranking. Google experts? Well, it turns out that the person at Google that was responsible for keeping the algorithm fresh and the search results fresh retired and everything went to shit when they left. Actually, I’m bett…

Really sounds as if your made up story is deeply rooted in your own experience. I am sorry if something like a new guy taking your position and claiming to be smarter has happened to you but creating imaginary stories is not quite what this comment section needs and you'd probably be better off dealing with this in a different way

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#114
post #102

I wonder is this is the cannery in the coal mine for the internet as a whole. Will the internet grow more and more quite as folks chat with local AI bots.

But what will ChatGPT 10 be trained on, if no one is posting blog posts, answering questions on stack overflow, or updating Wikipedia? OpenAI will have to change the logo to a snake swallowing its own tail.

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#115

The most help I ever got from SO for questions not already there, was because of their (perceived) strictness. The process of writing a high-quality question, with a minimally viable example, clearly lined out thought-processes, and other things tried, solved the question for me in most cases without me ever having to post it.

Rubber Duck.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#116

I tried asking a legitimate question before on SO about physics education and it got shut down because it wasn't a question with a definitive answer. What non-trivial question has straightforward answers? It's just a homework help site. No serious discussion is allowed.

The point of asking a question on stack exchange is to create a question answer pair as the whole goal of stack exchange is to create a repository of high quality question answer pairs. If it's not possible to select an answer to a question then it isn't a relevant question for stack exchange.

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#117
post #6

I think the problem is google losing the fight with spammers. It's being a while for me that I have to put "stackoverflow" in the search query to avoid sites with scraped content

What’s interesting is that Google was known for how hard it was to figure out the Google algorithm. Remember, when people were hired because they knew the secret sauce on how to get the best Google ranking. Google experts? Well, it turns out that the person at Google that was responsible for keeping the algorithm fresh and the search results fresh retired and everything went to shit when they left. Actually, I’m bett…

My bet is revenue went up for google with the second guy, so who is smarter is a matter of perspective.

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#118
post #43

Even though StackOverflow in the common use case has been taken over by ChatGPT, I sincerely hope it keeps operating, stays strict (even if it causes collateral) and keeps ban on LLM-generated content. The wheels of this kind of stuff turn slowly, but obviously ChatGPT was trained partly with data only gainable from a healthy StackOverflow-kind of site with users actively asking unique questions and enough people ans…

> Even though StackOverflow in the common use case has been taken over by ChatGPT Claim asserted without evidence.

Sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s not true, and for many of us its truth is prima facie because it’s true of both our own usage and the people we work with and talk to.

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#119
post #100

As much as Stack Overflow has helped me in my youth. The community made me feel stupid and I felt so much anxiety asking for help.

Stack overflow hasn't ever been a place to get "help" though, its basically a place to get told that your question is a duplicate even when it isn't.

Re: The Fall of Stack Overflow

#120

The problems I’ve noticed with Stack Overflow are a few and hard for me to narrow down but basically: - google used to return really relevant results for SO, and it stopped doing so at some point a while ago - moderation on SO has gotten progressively more horrible. can’t tell you how many times I found the exact, bizarre question I was asking only to see one comment trying to answer it and then a mod aggressively sh…

here’s a classic SO thread:

OP: “how can I accomplish X doing Y?”

top voted response: “I wouldnt do X by Y. Instead, I’d consider Z. It’ll do everything X by Y would do, plus these other things.”

buried sub comment to top voted response: “that’s not what he asked, to do X by Y (exact solution provided)”

then 10 comments blasting the guy who actually answered the question for not doing it the way the top voted answer did it.

Post reply on HN