Sigh. No they aren’t.
Cultural bubbles? I hardly know anyone who /isn't/ interested in astrology.
That said, I recently stopped attending a church, so maybe most of my associates were self-selecting to a different belief structure.
61–70 of 972 posts
Sigh. No they aren’t.
Cultural bubbles? I hardly know anyone who /isn't/ interested in astrology.
That said, I recently stopped attending a church, so maybe most of my associates were self-selecting to a different belief structure.
[flagged]
I'm a little bit incredulous reading this statement. In no world are those outlets in the same ballpark as Russian or Chinese state media. Just because a new source has a tendency towards bias, doesn't mean that it isn't reliable. There are a small handful of news organizations that make a best effort towards the truth - and WaPo, NYTimes, and WSJ haven't won as many Pulitzers as they have by being unreliable.
I think the easy way to look at this is that a certain segment of society will always want to believe in something beyond the observable world with the decline of organised religion amongst Western Europeans, astrology is one way they fill that void if astrology doesn't float your boat, there's always witchcraft and tarot, or crystals and alternative medicine. or if you're less inclined towards new-age horse you can…
I always love getting my tarot cards read. Do I believe it has special knowledge of the universe? Absolutely not. Does it get my thinking creatively and critically about the personal story that I have with my self? Yes. And that has some value.
But then if I ask them to admit that believing in it is unscientific, the response is something along the lines of "well it could be true". They know there's no evidence for it, but they're probably afraid of offending close friends that actually believe.
[flagged]
Tetraethyl lead, PFAS, phthalates, formeldehyde, pyrethroids, PM2.5, etc.