Live data from Hacker News

A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

thehustle.co

41–50 of 75 posts

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#41
post #29
post #21

Am I missing something here? Are these lotteries +EV in the first place? How does the lottery expect to make money if that is the case?

We call this "roll-over", when no-one wins so the pot accumulates. This week's draw doesn't need to be profitable, the overall scheme needs to be profitable. Say $2MM in tickets are sold, putting $1MM in the pot. And no-one wins. So next week, $2MM in tickets are sold, putting $1MM in the pot - which already contained $1MM from last week. Continue this over a few weeks. After 5 weeks you have $5MM in the pot - and an…

> Say $2MM in tickets are sold

what do you think about the format: [scalar] [si-prefix] [unit]

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#42

I wrote this comment the other day, about something similar: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766556#36768937 Like with trading systems, the thing that made it work here was not being smart about the maths. In fact anyone with high school maths would be able to work out when it was worth doing. The thing here was the audacity to try to put together a business around getting it done. Things like getting investor…

I’ve come to believe that this is a universal principle: disbelief regarding feasibility prevents actualization of vision; once one sees that it is done it is as if a mental barrier has been removed.

this is so true... brilliantly put.

However, even after the mental barrier is removed - Majority of us do not have the motivation to actualize our visions even after we know and believe that they are feasible.

I suspect that it takes a special human emotional/energy makeup to overcome enormous obstacles in pursuit of actualizing a vision. Thats what makes entrepreneurs/hustlers special.

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#43
post #33

I hate lotteries and gambling in general. Take from the hopeful, give to the lucky. And the house (almost) always wins. Yes, I have some respect for those who can game the system, because I like the house losing, but their winnings are still taken from the hopeful (or worse, the naive and stupid).

> I hate lotteries and gambling in general. Take from the hopeful, give to the lucky. Sorry, but you've just described the underpinnings of our current winner-take-most societal-wide economic systems. Every day, more and more of our systems are rooted in luck. Being born to the right family, getting into a prestigious university, getting a good job, timing the housing market, investing in the stock market, starting a…

Nope.

But even if you are correct, lotteries and gambling have more of the essence of "take from the hopeful, give to the lucky" than any of the things you described.

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#45
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I hate lotteries and gambling in general. Take from the hopeful, give to the lucky. Sorry, but you've just described the underpinnings of our current winner-take-most societal-wide economic systems. Every day, more and more of our systems are rooted in luck. Being born to the right family, getting into a prestigious university, getting a good job, timing the housing market, investing in the stock market, starting a…

Nope. But even if you are correct, lotteries and gambling have more of the essence of "take from the hopeful, give to the lucky" than any of the things you described.

> Nope.

Well, you got me there. Can't argue with that. Have a great Sunday.

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Arguably one is taking from the rich and the other is more likely taking advantage of the poor.

With crypto the old rich are the new poor!

nice sentiment, but imho most coins could be bankrolled by the average billionaere

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve come to believe that this is a universal principle: disbelief regarding feasibility prevents actualization of vision; once one sees that it is done it is as if a mental barrier has been removed.

this is so true... brilliantly put. However, even after the mental barrier is removed - Majority of us do not have the motivation to actualize our visions even after we know and believe that they are feasible. I suspect that it takes a special human emotional/energy makeup to overcome enormous obstacles in pursuit of actualizing a vision. Thats what makes entrepreneurs/hustlers special.

IMO this needlessly aggrandizes entrepreneurs. The way I see it, certain people end up in situations where they can take the risk, and some take the risk. For instance if you already have some wealth saved up you can take a couple of years to try your idea. Or if you work in a field where you are very likely to be able to get back in. On the other side, you might have relationships that are likely to come with you on your journey, whether that's customers or collaborators.

It just comes down to being able to give it a try, mainly from having a combination of low failure cost and high success probability.

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#48

Voltaire made a fortune in more or less the same way in 1730 [1]. > This system worked best if a consortium of players bought tickets together and split the winnings, so, writes Pearson, Voltaire, de la Condamine and 11 compatriots teamed up and by June 1730, all had made a tidy sum. [1] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/voltaire-enlighten...

Thank you I didn't know about this ! (And I happen to read this from Paris, right next to the Boulevard Voltaire)

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve come to believe that this is a universal principle: disbelief regarding feasibility prevents actualization of vision; once one sees that it is done it is as if a mental barrier has been removed.

this is so true... brilliantly put. However, even after the mental barrier is removed - Majority of us do not have the motivation to actualize our visions even after we know and believe that they are feasible. I suspect that it takes a special human emotional/energy makeup to overcome enormous obstacles in pursuit of actualizing a vision. Thats what makes entrepreneurs/hustlers special.

> Majority of us do not have the motivation to actualize our visions even after we know and believe that they are feasible.

Much of the time the decision not to pursue the vision is the right one, because so much sacrifice is required. A lot of successful entrepreneurs have tragic personal lives because in the pursuit of their vision they sacrifice their families. For those of us who are perhaps older, with a lot of personal commitments, and perhaps are also economically comfortable, those sacrifices are too great.

Re: A Romanian economist legally gamed the lottery

#50

I wrote this comment the other day, about something similar: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766556#36768937 Like with trading systems, the thing that made it work here was not being smart about the maths. In fact anyone with high school maths would be able to work out when it was worth doing. The thing here was the audacity to try to put together a business around getting it done. Things like getting investor…

I’ve come to believe that this is a universal principle: disbelief regarding feasibility prevents actualization of vision; once one sees that it is done it is as if a mental barrier has been removed.

four minute mile
Post reply on HN