Live data from Hacker News

TypeChat

microsoft.github.io

171–174 of 174 posts

Re: TypeChat

#171
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your coworkers must love you.

Indeed, we all do what we are good at and appreciate each other and no having to do the things they do But what does your comment have to do with any of this at all?

It's called sarcasm. But here, let me say the same thing directly: you are an insufferable prick. Imagine gatekeeping talking to a fucking chatbot.

Re: TypeChat

#172
post #141
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ChatGPT isn’t the limiting factor here, a good way to expose the toggles is. I recently tried to expose our company CRM to employees by means of a Teams bot they could ask for stuff in natural language (like „send an invite link to newlead@example.org“ or „how many MAUs did customer Foo have in June“), but while I almost got there, communicating an ever-growing set of actionable commands (with an arbitrary number of…

(How) did you solve this?

Write me an email if you’re interested in details, probably have some code to share. Address is in my profile.

Re: TypeChat

#173
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed, we all do what we are good at and appreciate each other and no having to do the things they do But what does your comment have to do with any of this at all?

It's called sarcasm. But here, let me say the same thing directly: you are an insufferable prick. Imagine gatekeeping talking to a fucking chatbot.

If this is how you talk to people, it is quite clear who the bigger prick is, you don't even know me to make such judgements, rather shallow don't you think?

Re: TypeChat

#174
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's called sarcasm. But here, let me say the same thing directly: you are an insufferable prick. Imagine gatekeeping talking to a fucking chatbot.

If this is how you talk to people, it is quite clear who the bigger prick is, you don't even know me to make such judgements, rather shallow don't you think?

I know enough to see you're not nearly as smart as you think you are.
Post reply on HN