Live data from Hacker News

Human Shader

humanshader.com

71–80 of 131 posts

Re: Human Shader

#71
People were too quick to claim so I wrote a hacky script to try to auto-claim in a loop and then ended up with a PNG in my terminal, beware, save the response to the request if you're going to automate the claiming part.

Well I got another pixel anyway.

Re: Human Shader

#72
post #63
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The page does actually say they want to see intermediate results “so we can validate your work.” (Edit that quote has been removed now.) But there’s no promise that they will. The photo feature may be more of an automated speed bump, a way to reduce silly answers and pixel spam, and let people self-select, than an active human moderation tool. Moderating is boring and expensive in time and/or money, why would anyone…

Validate is slightly vague here. I interpreted it as "so we can validate your work [was done by hand]."

Fair enough, I guess it is open to interpretation. The language on the page has changed now, the quote I posted is no longer there.

Re: Human Shader

#73
> Claim a random pixel for yourself [...] yours, and yours only, for the next 8 hours. [...] You can claim up to 4 pixels at a time.

Why not 1 at a time, and you can claim another immediately after completing the previous?

And if you have 4 pixels awaiting verification, you cannot claim another pixel unless and until one of those pixels is verified?

Re: Human Shader

#75
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the moderators are checking that the pixel was computed by hand, not that it's correct

The page does actually say they want to see intermediate results “so we can validate your work.” (Edit that quote has been removed now.) But there’s no promise that they will. The photo feature may be more of an automated speed bump, a way to reduce silly answers and pixel spam, and let people self-select, than an active human moderation tool. Moderating is boring and expensive in time and/or money, why would anyone…

> why would anyone actually sift through thousands of hand-written pages of arithmetic?

2840 pages. Doesn't seem crazy. Page looks like it was written by hand? Next. At two pages per second it's less than half an hour of work.

Re: Human Shader

#76
post #41

This is a particularly fun exercise when you recall that the original "computers" were people doing arithmetic, not at all dissimilarly to what’s done here, just with less parallelism. Though they did at least have mechanical adders and multipliers!

as depicted by the cool movie Hidden Figures

".. Based on the unbelievably true life stories of three of these women, known as "human computers", we follow these women as they quickly rose the ranks of NASA..."

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4846340/

Re: Human Shader

#78
post #73

> Claim a random pixel for yourself [...] yours, and yours only, for the next 8 hours. [...] You can claim up to 4 pixels at a time. Why not 1 at a time, and you can claim another immediately after completing the previous? And if you have 4 pixels awaiting verification, you cannot claim another pixel unless and until one of those pixels is verified?

I assume to stop one dedicated person doing too much of the image. The novelty here is the community aspect.

Re: Human Shader

#79
post #76
post #41

This is a particularly fun exercise when you recall that the original "computers" were people doing arithmetic, not at all dissimilarly to what’s done here, just with less parallelism. Though they did at least have mechanical adders and multipliers!

as depicted by the cool movie Hidden Figures ".. Based on the unbelievably true life stories of three of these women, known as "human computers", we follow these women as they quickly rose the ranks of NASA..." https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4846340/

Quote from imdb movie description:

> mathematicians that served as the brains behind one of the greatest operations in U.S. history

In this case, aren't they more like hands than brains?

The brains should be the ones who created the code. These people are just processing it, it's like manual labor.

Re: Human Shader

#80
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The page does actually say they want to see intermediate results “so we can validate your work.” (Edit that quote has been removed now.) But there’s no promise that they will. The photo feature may be more of an automated speed bump, a way to reduce silly answers and pixel spam, and let people self-select, than an active human moderation tool. Moderating is boring and expensive in time and/or money, why would anyone…

> why would anyone actually sift through thousands of hand-written pages of arithmetic? 2840 pages. Doesn't seem crazy. Page looks like it was written by hand? Next. At two pages per second it's less than half an hour of work.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN