Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: Google will delete inactive accounts

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 30 posts

Re: Tell HN: Google will delete inactive accounts

#11
post #9

"The simplest way to keep a Google Account active is to sign in to the account at least once every two years." Not a terrible requirement. If they are so important to you, why can't you login once every 2 years. Why is it bad news?

Are people in prison allowed to sign into their Google accounts? I imagine they wouldn't be able to bring 2FA or even a list of backup PWs with them (unless memorized in advance)

Re: Tell HN: Google will delete inactive accounts

#12
post #9

"The simplest way to keep a Google Account active is to sign in to the account at least once every two years." Not a terrible requirement. If they are so important to you, why can't you login once every 2 years. Why is it bad news?

I was forwarding Google Voice SMS messages from a second account so I could remain in contact with old friends (I ported my number I've had since high school). The only reason I had to create a second account was because I switched to Google Fi, which forbids your main account from also having a Google Voice account. Apparently actively using this service does not count as an "active login", because that account was…

Just so you know, you can now have Fi and Voice on the same account. Historically what you saying true, but it changed a couple years back.

Source: I had Voice and Fi on the same account.

Re: Tell HN: Google will delete inactive accounts

#13
post #9

"The simplest way to keep a Google Account active is to sign in to the account at least once every two years." Not a terrible requirement. If they are so important to you, why can't you login once every 2 years. Why is it bad news?

Are people in prison allowed to sign into their Google accounts? I imagine they wouldn't be able to bring 2FA or even a list of backup PWs with them (unless memorized in advance)

Depends on the prison, but if you're in maximum security prison, you may have bigger worries.

Re: Tell HN: Google will delete inactive accounts

#14
post #9

"The simplest way to keep a Google Account active is to sign in to the account at least once every two years." Not a terrible requirement. If they are so important to you, why can't you login once every 2 years. Why is it bad news?

Are people in prison allowed to sign into their Google accounts? I imagine they wouldn't be able to bring 2FA or even a list of backup PWs with them (unless memorized in advance)

Perhaps not - but then again there are lots of things that people in prison are not allowed to do (that's kind of the point).

Re: Tell HN: Google will delete inactive accounts

#15
post #9

"The simplest way to keep a Google Account active is to sign in to the account at least once every two years." Not a terrible requirement. If they are so important to you, why can't you login once every 2 years. Why is it bad news?

Are people in prison allowed to sign into their Google accounts? I imagine they wouldn't be able to bring 2FA or even a list of backup PWs with them (unless memorized in advance)

> Are people in prison allowed to sign into their Google accounts?

If it's so important to them, maybe their partners or family can login - or they can do a takeout and store their data in a hard drive. Who knows if Google services will be around when they get out, right?

Re: Tell HN: Google will delete inactive accounts

#19
post #18

The amount of corpo brainwash in the comments is amazing: "If it's so important... jump through a hoop... and another... and another". Fact remains - Google is unique in its constraint. It gives no added value over competitors. Why accept?

Researching other options will take some time + the deliverability/spam-detection will only get worse.

You can check e-mail price of "@gmail" on darkweb and compare it against other providers. For them it's a "threshold" to balance security on scale and they're doing a pretty good job imo.

Re: Tell HN: Google will delete inactive accounts

#20
post #18

The amount of corpo brainwash in the comments is amazing: "If it's so important... jump through a hoop... and another... and another". Fact remains - Google is unique in its constraint. It gives no added value over competitors. Why accept?

Because it's still perfectly reasonable. You simply cannot keep data forever. At some point you have to start removing old unused data. It is just not sustainable. I don't agree with complaining about every single thing corporations do just because they're corporations. Let's complain when they do actually unreasonable things.
Post reply on HN