31–40 of 54 posts
So in addition to worrying about fake AI stuff that is presented as real, we now also have real stuff presented as fake AI.
To be fair, we've always had startups pretending they have "AI" or "machine learning" but it was just mechanical turk or someone on upwork.
AI Mett Porker (I see what you did there) Maybe in my lifetime an AI could generate a few more seasons of Firefly (that got cancelled too soon)? Another AI challenge would be to super-impose Harrison Ford onto Alec Baldwin in the movie Hunt for Red October. That would give nice continuity to the Jack Ryan character across the Tom Clancy movie series (Patriot Games, Clear and Present Danger)
Writers Guild has nothing to worry about
The interesting thing here is that Matt and Trey have codified intentionality as a primary writing tool, and whatever this is, doesn't mention that once. That's a pretty major thing to overlook, like a blind spot or achilles' heel of the AI devs. In fact, this is a blind spot of ALL AI that I've yet seen. Matt and Trey approach writing scenes with the following intent: if a scene can be described as following up a pr…
I’ve been up all night flying internationally but I might have misunderstood.
The interesting thing here is that Matt and Trey have codified intentionality as a primary writing tool, and whatever this is, doesn't mention that once. That's a pretty major thing to overlook, like a blind spot or achilles' heel of the AI devs. In fact, this is a blind spot of ALL AI that I've yet seen. Matt and Trey approach writing scenes with the following intent: if a scene can be described as following up a pr…
The joke about Trump was pretty good, though.
I skimmed the paper and didn't see an answer to this: how much of the video did the AI actually generate? how much of it was touched up by humans and how much of it was actually drawn/animated solely by humans?
Judging by the rendered samples on the page, I'm gonna assume only the assets (backgrounds and characters) were AI generated. Animations, text, and camera movement were all done manually.
So in addition to worrying about fake AI stuff that is presented as real, we now also have real stuff presented as fake AI.
To be fair, we've always had startups pretending they have "AI" or "machine learning" but it was just mechanical turk or someone on upwork.
So in addition to worrying about fake AI stuff that is presented as real, we now also have real stuff presented as fake AI.
Why’s that a worry?
I agree it is not a worry, at least not of the same kind. I do worry a bit though about assuming something and reasoning/discussing with that premise, which is nullified if the premise was wrong.