No post body was provided.
Untitled topic
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: undefined
#2Ah yes. The same person who thinks COVID was "ethnically targeted" to spare Jews. He's full of great ideas.
https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/rfk-jr-says-covid-was-ethnical...
Re: undefined
#3We need to stop talking about this clown. He is the worst kind of candidate: a useful idiot for the dark money forces who financially back him.
Since RFK Jr. loves conspiracy theories, here’s mine: fringe candidates like him always end up having financial ties to countries and organizations with a vested interest in the destabilization of the USA.
Re: undefined
#4Ah yes. The same person who thinks COVID was "ethnically targeted" to spare Jews. He's full of great ideas. https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/rfk-jr-says-covid-was-ethnical...
This is the study RFK Jr. was talking about.
It's a peer reviewed, published scientific study in a highly respected journal.
Nothing about this is antisemitic.
https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s1291...
Re: undefined
#5We need to stop talking about this clown. He is the worst kind of candidate: a useful idiot for the dark money forces who financially back him. Since RFK Jr. loves conspiracy theories, here’s mine: fringe candidates like him always end up having financial ties to countries and organizations with a vested interest in the destabilization of the USA.
These allegations don't even make sense, they border sophistry.
You know RFK Jr. is the son of Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of John F. Kennedy, right?
Re: undefined
#6Ah yes. The same person who thinks COVID was "ethnically targeted" to spare Jews. He's full of great ideas. https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/rfk-jr-says-covid-was-ethnical...
This is the study RFK Jr. was talking about. It's a peer reviewed, published scientific study in a highly respected journal. Nothing about this is antisemitic. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s1291...
That appears to be true for the paper, but not to the statements attributed to RFK Jr., which uses language that is much stronger in terms of racial targeting.
A quote directly attributed to him makes that clear: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/15/us/politics/rfk-jr-remark...
I don't think what RFK Jr. is really related to the paper at all; whether it is peer reviewed and of high quality is irrelevant. It's his interpretation of it that matters in this case.
As a reminder, RFK Jr. has also said HIV may not cause AIDS, cell phones cause cancer, and believes his father and uncle were killed by the CIA. let's not pretend RFK Jr is not what he is, or that he didn't say what he said. His own wife and several other family members have come out and said that his statement was reprehensible.