Live data from Hacker News

Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

noahpinion.blog

591–600 of 816 posts

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#591
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I'm OK paying taxes to get to live in a society with universally-available (mostly) fee-free primary and secondary education that aspires to some set of standards. I'm not OK paying taxes to help Bobby Baptist send his kids to Jesus Is Lord Day School. Or kick in to rich parents' budget for Phillips Exeter. If we must have vouchers, let people keep their own tax money that would have gone to schools and use tha…

But Bobby Baptist's kids going to Jesus Is Lord Day School is assimilating those kids into their society at large and Jesus Is Lord Day School still needs to meet the curriculum and testing standards that any other school in the state has to. And more often than not those private schools are _exceeding_ the standard of the public education system. I spent years in both public and private schools. The worst part of pu…

>But Bobby Baptist's kids going to Jesus Is Lord Day School is assimilating those kids into their society at large and Jesus Is Lord Day School still needs to meet the curriculum and testing standards that any other school in the state has to. And more often than not those private schools are _exceeding_ the standard of the public education system.

Are they? There are a lot of folks who would disagree (and many of those are graduates of such institutions) with that assessment[0]:

   The city has determined that four Orthodox yeshivas are failing to provide
   an education “substantially equivalent” to what’s offered in public schools — 
   and recommends the state reach the same conclusion for another 14 yeshivas 
   the city says are ultimately under state authority.
   
   The findings are the results of a long-stalled and politically thorny 
   investigation that has stretched on since 2015.

   The city found that just seven schools they investigated met standards. 
   That’s in addition to two it found were up to standards in 2019.
   [...]
   The investigation was spurred by a complaint from a group called Young 
   Advocates for a Fair Education, or YAFFED, headed at the time by a yeshiva 
   graduate who argued his education left him ill-prepared for the world outside 
   of religious studies. YAFFED and other critics argue many so-called ultra-
   Orthodox yeshivas provide little to no secular instruction, particularly for 
   boys, and instead focus on religious studies. Representatives of the schools 
   have pushed back strenuously on those claims.

   The schools are private, but do receive some state funding and, like all 
   private schools in New York, are required to provide children with an 
   education “substantially equivalent” to what is offered in public schools. 
   The investigation kicked off a debate of what exactly substantially 
   equivalent means, prompting the state to develop rules for determining it. 
   
And that's just one city in the US. I am unaware of such reviews in other places (some likely do exist, I just haven't heard about it -- please do jump in if you're aware of similar investigations), but religious schools (of whatever stripe) exist to support their preferred religion above all else.

Public funding (and especially taking funds away from secular public schools) of religious schools is antithetical to the idea of a secular government and society.

[0] https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2023/06/30/new-yor...

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#592
post #585

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it's actually not that complicated, just look at what other schools in the country do, or what these did before the change then, with that data, you will know to replace "terribly fast" with the original "slow", and can try to make your proposal not depend purely on the semantics of inaccurately renaming "slow" to "terribly fast" remember, you are the one who started these word games by renaming the slow curriculum t…

> it's actually not that complicated, just look at what other schools in the country do, or what these did before the change Except that you have not done that. Where are your data? Did you make sure that the group you compared are representative to each other? How do you correct for all the differences in state (unemployment level, diversity in education, political orientation, level of rurality, ...) that all have…

>Except that you have not done that. Where are your data?

It's your responsibility, not mine, to prove that what was normal before is now "advanced" by the standards of the country, and that slow is now "normal"

> I'm not saying they had to remove advanced algebra in order to introduce advance data science, I'm saying they decided to replace something that they think is not challenging...

this contradicts the assertion that the class was too advanced, now it's not advanced enough? Doubt. Plus, you yourself are using the word "replace", here meaning removing 1 class and adding another: two acts. There's nothing requiring them to remove the first class, and there doesn't seem to be a convincing case for doing so. If you want to have a new class, go ahead, but don't nuke good, unrelated classes in the process.

>...by something more challenging, more engaging and more useful

is it, though? That's what they say, on 1 side of the issue, but it doesn't seem like that's the case, and again, both are useful, so that's not a valid excuse for nuking 1

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#593

Disclaimer: European. Is it not strange how in an article arguing from otherwise a very egalitarian, leftist viewpoint, when it discusses how students perform given more or less difficult classes, it somehow thinks the most relevant statistic is the race of the students? (Approximately, even, because American race designation is kinda weird anyway.) Sure, socio-economic circumstances are correlated with race. (Unfort…

Good point with a little nit.

Usually in data science, you "mine" for features or combination of features. That is you collect as much as possible, then actual find the critical features e.g. to construct a random forest/decision tree/ ...

Here they are going as you point out the other way. And the more I study U.S. history (and politics) the more racist I find it.

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#594
Equity is nonsense. Leftism (as demonstrated by California) is a race to the bottom. But life is competition to reach the top. Your kids are competing with others. Available resources are finite, population is increasing, therefore competition is required. And competition/adversity breeds development. Teach your kids to do better than other kids. Give them every tool you can to help them succeed and do better than their peers.

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#595

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm for vouchers because I don't think I should have to pay with my taxes for religious indoctrination masquerading as public education.

I'm sure it's different in other places, but around here the only alternative school in town is run by an organized religion. Come to think of it, that's also true of the next town. Are the voucher people envisaging some eduVC funding source that allows me to spin up a school to complete with the legacy one?

That’s exactly what I envision. I want thousands of school startups.

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#596

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that part of the problem is that I have no idea what values you are talking about that don't match society/parents. That is to say: I'm a leftist and I'm worried about schools indoctrinating kids into a whitewashed, anti-LGBTQ+, jingoistic understanding of the world. However, I'm sure there are Republican parents that are concerned about kids being indoctrinated into a "woke" understanding of the world. I don…

I am from the UK, so view the issue impartially. The issue is, from my view, very much a problem of the Left-wing in the US, introducing victim/oppressor politics into schools, teaching children primarily to regard themselves as activists first, and students second. I can also see it is causing a mental health crisis in students, who increasingly are under pressure to identify as an oppressed minority, in order to be…

>The issue is, from my view, very much a problem of the Left-wing in the US, introducing victim/oppressor politics into schools, teaching children primarily to regard themselves as activists first, and students second.

Where is this being done? What school districts specifically? What are the specific topics that "introduce victim/oppressor politics into schools?"

I'd really like to know, as I'm not aware of any of that stuff. Since you're obviously a "disinterested observer," without an agenda, I assume you've gathered actual evidence for your assertions.

My view (as an American "with an agenda") is very different from yours. If I'm wrong, I'd like to adjust my view. As such, please provide me with specific examples of what you're asserting.

Thanks!

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#597
post #433

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(A) problem is that, if you're going to start getting very specific about what math kids need to learn if they're not going into STEM, you end up with a pretty short list and you end up, in practice, with not really learning math or developing numerical intuition at all. (And let's ignore the fact that I directly used very little of what I learned in university engineering either.) When was the last time I did a geom…

Everyone needs to understand probability and statistics maybe 10X better than they currently do. That should be the focus!

Yes, this!

It’s crazy that we spend a decade of a person’s life forcing them to learn a skill that is so completely irrelevant to their lives and yet we ignore skills that could help them from being manipulated or forced into debt slavery.

I need to come up with a better analogy, but it’s like we were still forcing our children to manipulate a cotton gin and know the ins and outs of maintaining and repairing one. I mean, I’m sure it’s interesting and now I want to look up a YouTube video about cotton gins, but do we really need to force this upon everyone? And then we decide that if you didn’t memorize how to change out the plumbus in the cotton gin perfectly then you aren’t allowed to do further study in marine biology.

If I believed in conspiracy theories then I would think that Big Scary Corporations are in cahoots with The Government to keep the public from knowing how not to be manipulated and forcing them to work for low wages for their entire lives. But I don’t believe this because I think the reality is a lot more mundane and stupid. I think it’s just like the story you hear about why your mom learned to cook the ham by cutting off the end and finding out after some investigation that the only reason was because her grandmother had a small pan and we all just tend to continue doing what has sorta kinda worked without thinking about it. But in this case we can’t just make individual decisions to do something different because we’ve decided that the API between secondary school and college is an admissions test that includes certain irrelevant things that we can’t change because of history and the API between college and a job is something completely different.

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#598
post #517

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The USA is currently obsessed with race, and this influences all discussions. The United States has always been obsessed with race. The south had completely different schools based on a child's skin color. What makes you think this is new?

I totally agree that racial issues have always been a topic in American politics. from the colonial period, to secession from Brittan, to the failed secession of the south, to the civil rights movements, to now. That said, the relative importance of the issue and satisfaction obviously shifts over time. Gallop polling shows that that by many metrics, perceptions of racial Injustice are at a multi-decade high. It is i…

So the actual issue that we've started talking about how our obsession with race effects the people on the losing end of that deal.

>. It is interesting that far fewer people feel that black people are treated fairly than in the late 90's. It would be interesting to see data going back even further.

It seems intuitive to me. If you have a problem and then activists put in a ton of time to make that problem more visible, its going to change people's perceptions of social issues. For example, if you asked people in 1990 and 2020 if the Catholic church adequately protects children from sexual predators, you're probably gonna get a pretty drastic difference in responses.

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#599
post #356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is that this point of view ignores reality: motivated parents will just have their children learn calculus in outside classes. The reality is for these students, "standard" middle and high school math is mind-numbingly boring. The best outcome would be that the best schools and teachers use the surplus time to teach stuff that's off-curriculum like logic, discrete math, stats, programming, etc.

Maybe true but that won't get them a calculus credit on their transcript. > The reality is for these students, "standard" middle and high school math is mind-numbingly boring. >The best outcome would be that the best schools and teachers use the surplus time to teach stuff that's off-curriculum like logic, discrete math, stats, programming, etc. This is also true I was one of these students. My middle school did almo…

As far as I can tell you don't need an official transcript from an accredited school to get into college. We are homeschooling our kids and what I've read is that homeschoolers write their own transcript, the kids themselves write it, and they describe what they've accomplished and learned during their schooling career and admission depts in colleges tend to favor these kids over traditionally schooled kids.

I'm guessing that a traditionally schooled kid could just do the same. Especially since there's so much that they are probably learning outside of school. It would be a shame to ignore all of those skills and knowledge just because they weren't taught during the hours of 8 and 3, M-F.

Re: Refusing to teach kids math will not improve equity

#600
post #575

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For those who think this is hyperbole, see [1] for a mathematician taking down the framework. California's new standards were written by folks without a background in math nor neuroscience. They misquote neuroscience papers [2] while making mathematical mistakes in their policy paper. [1] https://sites.google.com/view/publiccommentsonthecmf/?ref=st... [2] https://drive.google.com/file/d/17O123ENTxvZOjXTnOMNRDtHQAOj..…

I've gone around in a few circles thinking about this. My kids curriculum is really different from when I was a kid. They've almost completely dropped grammer, spelling and cursive writing. They're teaching a lot more problem solving techniques in math. Some of this surprised me, but some of it I realized was actually pretty great. I think there's some really necessary attempts to go back to first principles on educa…

> "But teacher, I'll always have a calculator". Damn right. A calculator and Wikipedia and chatgpt. Remembering the quadratic equation is literally useless knowledge to retain.

Remembering the quadratic equation allowed you to make an educated argument against its usefulness, so it isn't "literally" useless (badum bum psh).

While I agree that there is tons of room for improvement on how/what/when we teach students different subjects, I think we should be very cautious about offloading subjects to tools before students have a firm grasp of the material.

In my opinion, one of the greatest benefits of deeply engaging with a variety of subjects is getting into the habit of asking "why". I think this is important because it encourages students to dig deeper. I can only speak for myself, but the times I have learned the most is by far when I took an interest and started asking how and why things work.

Imo, it's okay that students engage with complex subjects that they will never use, if for no other reason than that it will provide ample opportunities for them to ask why. Perhaps somewhere along the way they will discover that they are in fact in the small minority who will pursue math as a career.

Post reply on HN