Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

G/O media will make more AI-generated stories despite critics

vox.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 108 posts

Re: G/O media will make more AI-generated stories despite critics

#2

Post by damnesian »

Well, of course. We use Ai as a toy, just like the very first movie directors. to shock, sensationalize, and otherwise grab eyeballs and elicit a strong response. we're the dumbest apes, how could we do anything different than throw poo when presented with a novel situation?

Re: G/O media will make more AI-generated stories despite critics

#3

Post by _8j50 »

My suspicion is there will be a lot of new jobs that revolve around verifying random internet content or school work and such, not to tell if it is LLM generated but to simply validate the facts claimed in the post,essay,video,etc... I don't see why this can't be an economy either, a reputation scoring and content validity notarizing economy. Business idea! Lol.

Re: G/O media will make more AI-generated stories despite critics

#4

Post by version_five »

Remember when websites would have a long list of keywords in the background color and tiny font at the bottom?

I keep seeing these "AI will destroy X" articles, I've never seen one that wasn't ultimately referring to a minor incremental extension of something already prevalent.

Keywords gave way to link farms gave way to shitty outsourced "content" and now LLMs will be part of SEO. It's not really different from getting a content farm to write you a bunch of crap, just cheaper and faster. Search companies will adapt, and seo scammers will find some new thing. It's all such a minor part of the internet anyway.

Re: G/O media will make more AI-generated stories despite critics

#6

Post by boesboes »

It's the natural evolution of content marketing & SEO. I work at an IT company where we have ~15 ppl building and managing a few SaaS apps for the travel industry, and we have 50-60 ppl doing marketing as a service for our customers.

They write page after page of content that barely get read. It all just exists to make the google bot happy. And that works. They bring in more customers & revenue apparently. (honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if it's all wasted and the added revenue is due to the better website and backoffice, but what do i know.)

So it seems only natural to have AI generate that content for the Google bot and stop wasting all this effort. Obviously I can't prove nobody reads this content, but seriously.. A landing page about hot-tubs and how cool it is to have one in your holiday home? Doubt that anyone actually reads that..

EDIT: I guess my point is also: it's already flooded with crap, just look at al the blog spam for things like 'how to start nginx'

Re: G/O media will make more AI-generated stories despite critics

#7

Post by jrm4 »

I'm interested in this idea, as possibly a good thing.

I'm definitely pro "personal data poisoning," e.g, absent legislation and/or incentives with teeth - we should all be working on ways to confound and confuse and generally screw up the companies who are sucking up all the personal info.

This kind of runs parallel to that. Google search has been pretty bad for some time now, might be worth "burning this thing down to save it."

Re: G/O media will make more AI-generated stories despite critics

#9

Post by bobthepanda »

jrm4 wrote: post #7

I'm interested in this idea, as possibly a good thing. I'm definitely pro "personal data poisoning," e.g, absent legislation and/or incentives with teeth - we should all be working on ways to confound and confuse and generally screw up the companies who are sucking up all the personal info. This kind of runs parallel to that. Google search has been pretty bad for some time now, might be worth "burning this thing down…

The problem generally speaking is that any successor search engine will become a target of the massive spam firehose when sufficiently popular enough, and probably less well equipped to deal with it; Google is well resourced and already struggling. I don’t know that making the web less usable in general is worth it.
Post reply on HN