Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for mentioning this. Somehow I've searched for something like this before and couldn't find it. That didn't stop me from using Firefox tough. I just have my first bookmark in the toolbar point to "about: profiles" and use this page to launch new profile instances, create new ones etc.
Are you talking about this? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/profile-switc...
Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
221–230 of 559 posts
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#222There was a time when Firefox felt a lot slower than Chromium, but for a few years now it's been close enough (even if still somewhat slower) to not bother me, while Firefox clearly offers superior functionality and much better performance under high load. The last time Chromium has felt attractive compared to Firefox was a really long time ago. Glad to see it moving in the right direction still.
I switched to Firefox from Chrome years ago because Chrome was slower. Specially, when there were many tabs opened, switching tabs in Chrome were usually prefaced with a blank white screen for about 2 seconds. I've been staying with Firefox not for the performance (today Chrome loads Google sites like YouTube faster), but mainly for Tree Style Tab extension. I couldn't imagine opening more than a dozen of tabs withou…
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#223After this quick switch profile addon was release I have been 100% on firefox and love it.
I use profiles extensively and would love to know which extension you are using. Containers cover most of my sandboxing needs for private browsing, but I prefer to have a separate Firefox profile for business accounts/apps.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/profile-switc...
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I've seen mobile browsers handle many tabs better. It's my understanding that on mobile, tabs are unloaded from memory nearly instantly. You lose state but they use almost no resources. (I wish this was an option out of the box on Desktop. I've had extensions that do this and it's a godsend)
Chrome already does that by default: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/02/chrome-110-will-auto...
Infinite scroll is an especially bad offender here. If I'm 50 screens down on an infinite scroll that is work and a page refresh losing my place should be treated as a data-loss bug.
(an even better idea is not to use infinite scroll at all)
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#225After this quick switch profile addon was release I have been 100% on firefox and love it.
Thanks for mentioning this. Somehow I've searched for something like this before and couldn't find it. That didn't stop me from using Firefox tough. I just have my first bookmark in the toolbar point to "about: profiles" and use this page to launch new profile instances, create new ones etc.
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#226There was a time when Firefox felt a lot slower than Chromium, but for a few years now it's been close enough (even if still somewhat slower) to not bother me, while Firefox clearly offers superior functionality and much better performance under high load. The last time Chromium has felt attractive compared to Firefox was a really long time ago. Glad to see it moving in the right direction still.
I used to keep Chrome installed just for the dev tools, but the Firefox dev tools became good enough in probably 2013 or so.
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
Firefox is slower for me than Chrome, but that's because I have tab hoarding problem(2k tabs in Firefox right now).
As a fellow tab hoarder, I recommend Auto Tab Discard. Tabs are still open but aren't actually loaded until you click on them. With various configurable options for how that works. I have five windows open with about 1000 tabs in each, no performance problems at all. It's great!
I find it useful to periodically prune, though. Save to Pocket or other "to read" list for things I intend to eventually read. Bookmark things I may want sometime, but don't need open. Potentially use Tab Stash to save groups of references for particular research tasks. Toss things that realistically I'm just not going to get to ever.
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
On my main Firefox profile I'm rarely below 1000 tabs. I also use them as bookmarks and backlog, and every couple of months I scroll through the entire tab bar and close everything unimportant. The address bar also searches all open tabs and lets me jump to matches.
This is blowing my mind right now, how do you operate with so many tabs? For me, as soon as I can’t tell which site is in which tab it means I need to close some. And I don’t see the utility of having so many tabs open, since you can obviously only use one at a time. So if you have 100 or 1000 open, most are not being used most of the time, so why not close them? What do you lose from closing tabs versus what do you…
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#229Firefox is a great browser and Mozilla is a (generally) great organization. It's my daily driver on all my devices (except my TV ha), it's fast and has great plugins that also work in mobile. Philosophically I'm very much a "root for the underdog" type of person so it makes me happy that way, too. Only very rarely (every few months) am I forced to use Chrome for a site - and in my view, that's a huge ding on the site…
Same. Been using it since it was called Camino then Firebird, a confusing namespace collision :P
Re: Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
On my main Firefox profile I'm rarely below 1000 tabs. I also use them as bookmarks and backlog, and every couple of months I scroll through the entire tab bar and close everything unimportant. The address bar also searches all open tabs and lets me jump to matches.
This is blowing my mind right now, how do you operate with so many tabs? For me, as soon as I can’t tell which site is in which tab it means I need to close some. And I don’t see the utility of having so many tabs open, since you can obviously only use one at a time. So if you have 100 or 1000 open, most are not being used most of the time, so why not close them? What do you lose from closing tabs versus what do you…
One is as a sort of ad-hoc to-do list. When I leave a tab open it's because something is unfinished and I mean to come back to it soon. (I just wish there was a chronological view so that I could easily delete the oldest tabs).
The second purpose is to store the scroll position of longer articles that I haven't finished reading.