Being "an ethical alternative to" is appealing to some users; but there is a ceiling to this approach. And there is more and more competition in that space (chromium, brave, or even safari). So the share of people putting "ethicality" as their primary deciding factor is split amongst more option.
Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
91–100 of 245 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#92I switched to Chrome the first day it became available, because it was just so much faster.
You don't need a monopoly or advertising to grow a product that sells itself that well. (Those absolutely did come later.)
Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The nice part is that, because it's owned by Mozilla, users don't have to worry about a bait and switch at the end of the growth phase lol. Do you mean this seriously? Could you expand further because I just don't see where you're coming from.
Mozilla doesn't have VC backers that expect double-digit returns. At the top of the Mozilla structure is a non-profit foundation. Mozilla still has an incentive to make money, of course, but it does not require outsized returns and it is by its nature less inclined to place profit above mission or user experience.
Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#94One of the reasons: Massive advertising by Google to convince people to "try chrome". It is only relatively recently that visiting a google property was not met with: "Google X is best used in Chrome -- install Chrome now." (with "install chrome" being a link to the installer. No such massive advertising campaign ever existed to try to convince folks to "install Firefox".
Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#95I was an avid Firefox user, until it started adding services that I never asked for, namely Pocket. Things that should have been an add-on were now a core feature of the product.
This attitude has always confused me. “Firefox did something I didn’t like so I switched to a browser which does hundreds of things to undermine the free and open internet”.
Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#96Chrome used to be a lot faster years back so I switched. Firefox sadly has never given me a reason to switch back. Chrome is still fast and generally easy to use. (Maybe others here can give me good reasons to switch?) Chrome also has some obscure features I rely on that Firefox does not have (or just doesn't do well): * Firefox does not support Touch ID on macOS. I can't actually log into a lot of my sites * I can't…
Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#97Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#98Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
If random websites break, it's because the developer didn't do any testing in Firefox. IIRC Firefox follows standards more closely than Chrome and Chrome has random additional features that aren't standard that can make websites better, e.g YouTube, Google Maps
Agreed. What do you expect users to do here? Use Chrome or try to force a few thousand websites to test on Firefox?
That was not a good time.
Re: Ask HN: Why does Firefox have such a low market share anyways?
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am a developer on a team of developers for a large data and interaction-rich website and we've watched the stats morph over the past 8 years from 23% mobile to 23% desktop. It's been a very swift revolution. I do a lot of QA on my phone now. I have been a Firefox proponent for at least ten years and resolved to do most of my QA on FF since I was most familiar with its features. Something that is very irksome about…
You can't use uBlock Origin on iOS?