Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could have recognized that if you even think you need Tor and Signal to protect yourself from your own government, you need to organize politically to install representatives who ensure you don't think you need those things. We overlook that young people with tech jobs in the 90's humiliated a lot of their peers, ones who went on to pursue messy politcal careers instead of business ones. Those peers learned to ha…
To be blunt, I don't think the majority of the populace actually want those things, or at least don't mind the current state of affairs. And then it doesn't matter how much you politically organize - a superminority in a democracy doesn't get much say either way. OTOH if you evolve the tools, they keep working regardless of what the law says (even if the law specifically prohibits such tools).
Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
271–280 of 409 posts
Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
For completeness, read the anti-federalist papers too. The collective opinion of Hamilton, Madison, and Jay is just one point of view.
I guess I don't get why the arguments against the Constitution of the time would be useful for "understanding the intent of the Constitution and Bill of Rights"?
Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#273Governments seem to want to have it both ways. As new technologies are introduced they assume that capabilities and practices available to analogous predecessors must remain available to them (e.g. wire-tapping phones => undermining cryptography) but they don’t feel the same way about public benefits or rights associated with other technology that is being replaced (anonymous cash transactions => ???) It also seems l…
Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#274Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#275> “I think what has happened over the you know, handful of decades in which the surveillance business model has interpolated our core infrastructure — to the point that we’re surveilled in to an extent we don’t have a sense of — is that that choice has been made for us,” Whittaker said. This is an honest question: did she mean to say "infiltrated", or is this usage of "interpolated" a valid one that I just don't unde…
Interpolate: to alter or corrupt by inserting foreign matter; but I have only seen it used this way for text
Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unless you are born into generational wealth, you are by construction a Prole. If you need to or had to work for a living until you could afford not to, then you are a Prole. Whether you choose to "betray" this class - and fight in support of the people who make the rules, the slave owners, those who play god without permission - is a different thing.
Only dummies think in classes. People are people.
Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll start off by saying I don't have a solution. But if I don't have any alternatives, I'd much rather have the "you can't burn wood in your fireplace" people in charge than the "force people to live as the gender assigned at birth" people. One of those people is pushing policy that ultimately saves the human race from making the planet uninhabitable, while the other is imposing their small-minded religious worldvie…
I agree with you on all points. I was straining to think of a good example of the 'left-wing authoritarian' but I have definitely experienced it, and apart the location of birth they are the same exact people who are just as intolerant on right. On aggregate all humans operate pretty much the same everywhere in the way they think and operate -- the only difference is experiences and culture. That was the the point I…
The problem, of course, is that none of them were actually left-wing. They were all just bog-standard dictatorships, using left-wing-ism as their excuse to maintain power, but not actually doing left-wing-ism.
Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#278Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that's demonstrably false. I don't have much experience or knowledge of politics outside the US, so I can only speak to US politics. The American right and left are very different when it comes to policy platform, and electing one or the other actually does have a measurable difference on what ends up happening to people in the country. This is especially true when we consider minority groups. I agree that bo…
> But even if I use your terminology, the "left wing tyrants" and "right wing tyrants", if one or the other were given complete control of the country... well, the country would look very different after some time, depending on which side were given control. Well this is actually demonstrably false. Biden currently has the house and the senate, Trump has the house, the senate and the Supreme Court, Obama had the hous…
Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#279Re: Signal president says company will not comply with U.K. ‘mass surveillance’ law
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
The alternative is the UK drafting people to fight in ukraine, which also makes 0 sense?
Obviously the concern is an escalation of that war which pulls NATO into the conflict fully. I don't believe that's a likely scenario, but being deliberately obtuse isn't the right way address that somebody expressing that concern.