Live data from Hacker News

FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

cnbc.com

121–130 of 156 posts

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#121
post #34

> Schubauer-Berigan acknowledged during a press conference with journalists Wednesday that the studies could contain flaws that skewed the results. She said the classification should be viewed as a call to conduct more research into whether aspartame can cause cancer in humans. > “Aspartame is one of the most studied food additives in the human food supply. FDA scientists do not have safety concerns when aspartame is…

The WHO does have a tendency to lean overly cautious. But you have to remember that the FDA is not working for YOUR best interest either. When the FDA says that something is “safe”, what it actually means is “the economic impacts of this are probably negligible in a lifetime”. So if aspartame causes cancer after your career is over, then it’s safe according to the FDA. The WHO isn’t under the same lobbying or economi…

> So if aspartame causes cancer after your career is over, then it’s safe according to the FDA.

That is a big claim. It fits my priors. But is there any evidence for it?

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#123
post #4

> An adult who weighs 70 kilograms, or 154 pounds, would have to drink more than nine to 14 cans of aspartame-containing soda daily to exceed the limit and potentially face health risks. Okay, but if I consume 9 to 14 cans of sugar-based soda, I don't wind up with the same cancer risk? It's a ludicrous amount of aspartame/soda to be sure, but there -is- something potentially an issue with aspartame somewhere in there…

> Okay, but if I consume 9 to 14 cans of sugar-based soda, I don't wind up with the same cancer risk? No, you will end up with type 2 diabetes. > Something's there, even if it's negligible. Then what is the point of wasting everyone’s time with publicizing it? Just last weekend, I was with a parent who would not let her kids have sugar free popsicles, but was okay with them regularly eating sugary popsicles. For some…

> For some reason, they think that a tiny bit of aspartame has a higher probability of causing her kids greater harm than a ton of refined sugar.

Or they think like me that when you taste sweet it should be sugar

Human biology is very complex. What we do not know about it is more important than what we do know.

I do not trust novel chemicals that trick a body into thinking it is getting sugar, but it's not.

Better a bit of sugar for real than telling the body that it is getting a lot of sugar and giving it none

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#124
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Okay, but if I consume 9 to 14 cans of sugar-based soda, I don't wind up with the same cancer risk? No, you will end up with type 2 diabetes. > Something's there, even if it's negligible. Then what is the point of wasting everyone’s time with publicizing it? Just last weekend, I was with a parent who would not let her kids have sugar free popsicles, but was okay with them regularly eating sugary popsicles. For some…

Tbf, unrefined sugar is just as bad as refined sugar

> Tbf, unrefined sugar is just as bad as refined sugar

Evidence?

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#125
post #121
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The WHO does have a tendency to lean overly cautious. But you have to remember that the FDA is not working for YOUR best interest either. When the FDA says that something is “safe”, what it actually means is “the economic impacts of this are probably negligible in a lifetime”. So if aspartame causes cancer after your career is over, then it’s safe according to the FDA. The WHO isn’t under the same lobbying or economi…

> So if aspartame causes cancer after your career is over, then it’s safe according to the FDA. That is a big claim. It fits my priors. But is there any evidence for it?

From what I've seen, it appears that plastics/endocrine disruptors are evidence of this. BPA being a previous example [1], with most other plastics being a current example [2], including the "BPA free" replacements like BPS.

[1] https://www.nrdc.org/press-releases/nrdc-fda-reach-settlemen...

[2] https://sdg.iisd.org/news/household-plastic-products-disrupt...

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#126
post #4

> An adult who weighs 70 kilograms, or 154 pounds, would have to drink more than nine to 14 cans of aspartame-containing soda daily to exceed the limit and potentially face health risks. Okay, but if I consume 9 to 14 cans of sugar-based soda, I don't wind up with the same cancer risk? It's a ludicrous amount of aspartame/soda to be sure, but there -is- something potentially an issue with aspartame somewhere in there…

Probably obvious to many, but I wanted to throw out there: after quick audit of my kitchen, I found aspartame in or added to other products (e.g., chewing gum, coffee, smoothie mixes, cereal, ice cream, etc.). So lets make sure we keep that in mind when quantitatively measuring aspartame consumption!

How many processed foods in your kitchen?

I have zero aspartame. Certainly none in my coffee

It should be food in your kitchen

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#127
post #53

Diet soda and sweeteners behind them are still a scam even if they don’t “cause cancer.” They’re a scam because they still cause insulin response. Pancreas cranks out insulin after tasting the soda, and there no blood sugar to react with. My uncle drank tons of Diet Coke and got pancreatic cancer. Doesn’t mean diet soda caused his pancreatic cancer, but he definitely didn’t loose weight by drinking the stuff.

> My uncle drank tons of Diet Coke and got pancreatic cancer. Doesn’t mean diet soda caused his pancreatic cancer, but he definitely didn’t loose weight by drinking the stuff. The point for most people of Diet Coke isn't to lose weight. It's to avoid the harm caused by sugar, while still having something to drink. Diet sodas are definitely way, way better for anybody with sugar senstivities or diabetes. Plain water w…

> The point for most people of Diet Coke isn't to lose weight.

Anecdotally I see different things.

People overweight, or who fear that, use aspartame IMO

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#128
post #124
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tbf, unrefined sugar is just as bad as refined sugar

> Tbf, unrefined sugar is just as bad as refined sugar Evidence?

all the bad parts of sugar are from the sugar part of it, not some magic poison added by "refining"

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#129
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, there are absolutely people who drink this much aspartame. Probably we should think of its danger level like Advil: normal sparse amounts are fine. But if you are doing it constantly you're going to have issues.

It doesn't even mean that. 14 cans doesn't cause issues, it is when the FDA thinks risk kicks in. That might still be a 1 in a million chance, after hitting the 14 can limit

fair

Re: FDA says aspartame is safe, disagreeing with WHO finding

#130
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Okay, but if I consume 9 to 14 cans of sugar-based soda, I don't wind up with the same cancer risk? No, you will end up with type 2 diabetes. > Something's there, even if it's negligible. Then what is the point of wasting everyone’s time with publicizing it? Just last weekend, I was with a parent who would not let her kids have sugar free popsicles, but was okay with them regularly eating sugary popsicles. For some…

> For some reason, they think that a tiny bit of aspartame has a higher probability of causing her kids greater harm than a ton of refined sugar. Or they think like me that when you taste sweet it should be sugar Human biology is very complex. What we do not know about it is more important than what we do know. I do not trust novel chemicals that trick a body into thinking it is getting sugar, but it's not. Better a…

Most people are choosing between “a lot of sugar” or “a little bit of low calorie sweetener”. The former has known problems. The latter does not.
Post reply on HN