31–40 of 168 posts
What's the monetization model here? Is this a closed-source version of their open-source model? (That's suggested by the phrase in the article, "a commercial version of LLaMA, its open-source large language model".)
Meta is going to ruin open ais moat on purpose. Great business strategy and good for everyone but metas competitors
Is the title an oxymoron? Open-source commercial?
Maybe they've solved the fingerprinting problem and can identify text generated from their model, and this is a way of discovering the market they can sell more advanced models to directly. B2B leadgen...
What's the monetization model here? Is this a closed-source version of their open-source model? (That's suggested by the phrase in the article, "a commercial version of LLaMA, its open-source large language model".)
Maybe they've solved the fingerprinting problem and can identify text generated from their model, and this is a way of discovering the market they can sell more advanced models to directly. B2B leadgen...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you for succinctly explaining the difference, I learned something today
Compiling source code doesn't cost million of dollars though
What's the monetization model here? Is this a closed-source version of their open-source model? (That's suggested by the phrase in the article, "a commercial version of LLaMA, its open-source large language model".)
Based on the podcast with Lex Friedman and Mark Zuckerberg, see ~minute 30. My hypothesis based on the context of Mark discussing the release is that it's going to be completely open source and can licensed to be used commercially. Not that Meta is going to add a whole new revenue side of business to compete with OpenAI. i.e. "Here is model, with commercially permissive licensing" not "Here is model that you can use…
They can even write it as 'good will' on their financial statements.
It kind of is working.