Bard’s latest update: more features, languages and countries

> As a point of comparison, I posed the exact same question to OpenAI's ChatGPT-4. It responded with a spot-on account of the event, complete with rich detail and an impressive level of accuracy.

Which, most likely, implies that chatgpt was trained and retains actual book content rather than random people talking about it on the internet.

Which model is more likely to be in violation of some copyright?

We've been experimenting with LLMs to create price predictions and stock analysis for day trading, and I really haven't been impressed with Bard at all. People in the comments are comparing it to gpt-3.5 and, for our use at least, I wouldn't say it's even remotely close. It's a very clear win for OpenAI.

It's not just that the accuracy of the predictions is wrong, it's that the analysis itself is just not in any way usable. We explicitly describe what the response should look like but Bard will do its own thing.

Here is an example of ChatGPT for RIVN:

"Rivian Automotive (RIVN) has shown a strong upward momentum in recent discussions, with the latest figure reaching 105.51. The stock's current price is $25.62, with a significant increase in volume to 1.41M from its 65-day average of 38.68M. The stock has been trading above its 10-day SMA ($22.08), 20-day SMA ($18.28), and 50-day SMA ($15.68), indicating a bullish trend. The RSI values are above 80, suggesting the stock is currently overbought. Considering the positive market sentiment towards tech stocks and Amazon's record sales during its Prime Day event, which could indirectly benefit Rivian as Amazon is a major stakeholder, an entry price around $25.70 seems plausible. The first price target could be set at $26.20, followed by a second target at $26.70. Confidence level: 75%."

Here is Bard with the same prompt:

"Analysis:

Based on the data you have provided, I believe that the stock RIVN is likely to continue to rise in the near future. The current price is slightly below the 20 day SMA, which suggests that the stock is undervalued. Additionally, the momentum data is positive, which indicates that there is strong buying pressure. The latest market news is also positive, as it suggests that the overall market is bullish.

However, it is important to note that there are some risks to consider. The stock is still highly volatile, and it could experience a pullback in the near future. Additionally,"

Yes, it does end after a comma. That's not me trying to make it look bad.

I have a standard battery of prompts for LLMs, mostly to see how well they cope with being tricked, handling ambiguous responses, or handed outright falsehoods.

Bard did surprisingly well this time around, though it still fails to respond correctly to the prompt 'What is the fourth word in this sentence?'

The ChatGPT one, but that isn’t my problem. My concern is whether it gives me good information. The issue of copyright is an unfortunate issue for someone else to litigate.