R.I.P. my sauerkraut fan club Let me be the first to bring Jung into this, "What you resist, persists", in trying to avoid the usage of slurs, you had to go and commit them to a public branch of source code to be saved in the arctic vault for eternity.
Funny enough I went to a Krautrock mini-festival a few weeks ago, here in Germany. Nobody I know cares about the term "kraut". At this point it is just outdated WW2 lingo that never caught on here. I feel like "Kartoffel" is often used in a more offensive way. Although I've never really seen someone getting really offended.
Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
51–60 of 98 posts
Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#52A pal's surname is on the list, guess he just has to change his name in real life
Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#53Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#54I think that the reappropriation of slurs, like yankee, whig, tory, queer, etc., is a positive thing. But this practice serves to lock them in place, helping to insure that they remain slurs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reappropriation
Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#55Forgive my naïveté but isn’t bluesky open source and decentralized? So wouldn’t say some group just spin up an instance without these restrictions?
Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#56Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#57Like I guess your username could be “BobHatess” but that just self identifies you as an idiot.
Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but they're currently prefederation (can't run your own instance yet ) and still making architectural decisions about how moderation will work. they're balancing onboarding new users with keeping up with high expectations of their current userbase. I'm not sure how the federation story compares with mastadon, I've mostly heard talk of composite block lists (everyone you block is public on bluesky so you could ha…
> Yes, but they're currently prefederation (can't run your own instance yet) What's stopping you?
Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#59> add more words that should be cought I hope they have fewer typos in their slur list than in their code comments :) I started reading the list from the bottom up, and saw the N word written with a W a first letter. I first thought they were going to do a .replace("W", "N") to avoid spelling the word in plain text. They'll have issues once github bans slurs from source code! ;)
Re: Bluesky now checks against this array of slurs when creating a username
#60Forgive my naïveté but isn’t bluesky open source and decentralized? So wouldn’t say some group just spin up an instance without these restrictions?
What'll happen though is that the bsky.app instance (which is the largest one and basically the flagship right now) will probably de-federate with instances that have usernames that include those slurs.