This is why I don’t want alternative payment options on iOS. It’s 1 click cancel on subscriptions. It’s enforced and they have no say or cannot make it difficult for me to cancel.
The UX is great, but not worth paying 30% more.
Singapore a year of Disney plus is $120 from Disney. It’s $120 on iOS.
I prefer that the government doesn't go too heavy handed with the rule and try to solve all problems with requirements such as maintaining detailed phone records. We don't want huge costs of compliance making it harder for small players to enter the market. I think the rule of "sign up online, cancel online using a clearly visible option in the account settings", plus the legalese to cover corner cases, would be a hu…
> We don't want huge costs of compliance making it harder for small players to enter the market.
If that were the effect of the FTC's maneuvering, I would not expect Netflix or Disney to oppose it. It would be the government helping them build moats - a wonderful reason for them to pay those lobbyists.
Singapore a year of Disney plus is $120 from Disney. It’s $120 on iOS. HBO go is same price. Prime video is same price. The only one I can’t pay for is Netflix. So your point is moot.
One of the great perks of living in the Netherlands. We already have this. If you can sign up in 1 minute using the web you must also be able to cancel in one minute using the web (For the Dutch: Wet van Dam). This rule is only for consumers not for businesses. Consumers are very well protected here.
I keep running into Dutch e-commerce sites that advertise prices without fees and VAT, and I haven't figured out who I'm supposed to complain to. Just yesterday, the first indication the prices weren't accurate is when I saw the real total in iDEAL.
Are you looking at b2b sites perhaps? Afaik, in Germany, you can show b2b prices without VAT.
Singapore a year of Disney plus is $120 from Disney. It’s $120 on iOS. HBO go is same price. Prime video is same price. The only one I can’t pay for is Netflix. So your point is moot.
I prefer that the government doesn't go too heavy handed with the rule and try to solve all problems with requirements such as maintaining detailed phone records. We don't want huge costs of compliance making it harder for small players to enter the market. I think the rule of "sign up online, cancel online using a clearly visible option in the account settings", plus the legalese to cover corner cases, would be a hu…
How many interstitials would you allow after the clearly visible option in the account settings?
How many interstitials do you think the judge will let you get away with when the law clearly states "it should be as easy as signing up"?
A really wonderful way to "fight click to cancel" would be providing better content and a better experience and charging less. You know - all the things that would make someone want to stay.
Instead, they use legal borderline-fraud to chase profits.
One of the great perks of living in the Netherlands. We already have this. If you can sign up in 1 minute using the web you must also be able to cancel in one minute using the web (For the Dutch: Wet van Dam). This rule is only for consumers not for businesses. Consumers are very well protected here.
I keep running into Dutch e-commerce sites that advertise prices without fees and VAT, and I haven't figured out who I'm supposed to complain to. Just yesterday, the first indication the prices weren't accurate is when I saw the real total in iDEAL.
Are you using a VPN or proxy? I never saw any website without VAT prices. I did once find a site where the prices were different when viewing it with an apple device.
This is why I don’t want alternative payment options on iOS. It’s 1 click cancel on subscriptions. It’s enforced and they have no say or cannot make it difficult for me to cancel.
Apple has control over which apps they allow. Even with alternate payment methods they can still enforce 1 click cancel, they just don't want to because money.