What an asinine concern. Don’t want your data on threads? Don’t use threads.
Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
11–20 of 458 posts
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#12Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#13What an asinine concern. Don’t want your data on threads? Don’t use threads.
Even if you don't use Threads, when they eventually add ActivityPub support, Mastodon users' data will inevitably be harvested. Instance admins have been signing a pact[1] to defederate with Meta for this reason, in addition to the fact that they don't trust Meta to moderate their instance well enough for it to be safe to federate with. [1] https://fedipact.online/
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#14Meta scraping your name and doing other shenanigans is a different subject and obviously bad, but the rest is like complaining joining a public torrent tracker and being mad about leaking your ip address to its peers.
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#15What an asinine concern. Don’t want your data on threads? Don’t use threads.
"Even if I only make followers-only posts, which aren't public and can't be boosted, if somebody who's following me replies, any of their followers on Threads will see my account name and instance" and also "If somebody on another instance who follows me boosts one of my public or unlisted posts, people on Threads who are following them may be able to see everything I've said in the post"
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#16The best way to handle it is to make a "minimum viable" account and do absolutely nothing with it, ever, except login and logout annually. Set up a spam filter to trash every single notice from the company.
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#17"Decentralized access for everyone, unless it gets popular enough that somebody actually wants to interop with it" I understand the Meta hate, but joining a very explicitly public and intentionally republishable service and then being unhappy that your data is public and intentionally republishable is bizarre to me.
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#18What an asinine concern. Don’t want your data on threads? Don’t use threads.
Even if you don't use Threads, when they eventually add ActivityPub support, Mastodon users' data will inevitably be harvested. Instance admins have been signing a pact[1] to defederate with Meta for this reason, in addition to the fact that they don't trust Meta to moderate their instance well enough for it to be safe to federate with. [1] https://fedipact.online/
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#19not a problem for 99.99 percent of people.
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#20"Decentralized access for everyone, unless it gets popular enough that somebody actually wants to interop with it" I understand the Meta hate, but joining a very explicitly public and intentionally republishable service and then being unhappy that your data is public and intentionally republishable is bizarre to me.
This reaction has shades of nimbyism: Yes we care about climate change + housing affordability + are in favor of increasing immigration. No we can't have those evil developers building big apartment buildings in my neighborhood! How dare you insinuate these things are related in any way!