Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
privacy.thenexus.today
Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
1–10 of 458 posts
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#2Meta would have no more (extra) access to Fedi posts than an large Mastodon instance like Mastodon.social would have.
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#3I understand the Meta hate, but joining a very explicitly public and intentionally republishable service and then being unhappy that your data is public and intentionally republishable is bizarre to me.
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#41 - I mean on the US where Meta really cares about. It's probably one on most countries where Meta has revenue, but that won't send anybody to jail.
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#5Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#6"Decentralized access for everyone, unless it gets popular enough that somebody actually wants to interop with it" I understand the Meta hate, but joining a very explicitly public and intentionally republishable service and then being unhappy that your data is public and intentionally republishable is bizarre to me.
Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#7Re: Blocking Threads won't be enough to protect privacy once they join the Fediverse
#8What an asinine concern. Don’t want your data on threads? Don’t use threads.
To me that still seems fairplay on a platform that's designed to be open and heralded that way. Not a opinion I hold strongly though.