Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

theverge.com

391–400 of 490 posts

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#391

They ruined bethesda, they're going to ruin... Oh wait bliz is already optimized for money and delivering garbage content

They ruined Bethesda? Did everyone forget about Fallout 76 already?

That and ESO are under current development under M$ ownership, no? They are my main angers about Bethesda right now.

I played FO:NV and 3, again and again, but everything after it has been a doubled down poor experience

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#392
post #365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a very weird coincidence that every major film studio started streaming services after that law ended. I thought it was more general like a cut between production and distribution not production and theatres. Now we are in the same position as a hundred years ago. At that time you would have to go into a theatre by the production company and now you have to go to the streaming service of the production company.…

> That split between production and distribution has to come back. What if Netflix had made and won that argument before 2020 to prevent production companies from also streaming content? I think Netflix missed a trick here.

But then it wouldn't have been long before competitors emerged in the market threatening Netflix's content deals. I believe only way to reinforce their position was to make their own content.

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#393

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not the Boogeyman you think it is. You used to have to buy a game for $60 and if you didn't like it? Well too bad, that's $60 down the drain. Now you can just move on to the next one. I get that for enthusiasts owning a physical game may be more desirable, but for the majority of gamers (casual gamers) a subscription based service is a better option.

> I get that for enthusiasts owning a physical game may be more desirable It is more desirable. So is not having to be connected to the internet to play your games. So is not paying for something that can be taken from you at any time for any reason without reimbursement. So is having a copy of your game that can't be edited or censored at any time (including silently) and which can always be played in its original f…

Thank you for this comment. I relate to every one of your points.

Especially the silent/forced updates. It can be SO bad in games. since the OP is about blizzard- look at hearthstone. Its a card game where you can’t trade, and the cards you sank money into can just get nerfed when the next expansion comes out. It amazes me this is acceptable to some.

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#394

Maybe it's just sour grapes from me, but it feels like a lot of these acquisitions are for has-been companies that were great 10+ years ago but haven't had much success lately. Bethesda, Double Fine, and now Activation Blizzard.

The game Blizzard just released, Diablo 4, was the “best-selling opening in Blizzard’s history, crossing an auspicious $666 million in global sell-through in the first five days following its June 6 launch”. https://investor.activision.com/news-releases/news-release-d...

This places it among the fastest selling video games of all time (https://vgsales.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_fastest-selling_vide...) so yes, it’s just sour grapes from you.

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not the Boogeyman you think it is. You used to have to buy a game for $60 and if you didn't like it? Well too bad, that's $60 down the drain. Now you can just move on to the next one. I get that for enthusiasts owning a physical game may be more desirable, but for the majority of gamers (casual gamers) a subscription based service is a better option.

> It's not the Boogeyman you think it is. You used to have to buy a game for $60 and if you didn't like it? Well too bad, that's $60 down the drain. Now you can just move on to the next one. I get that for enthusiasts owning a physical game may be more desirable, but for the majority of gamers (casual gamers) a subscription based service is a better option. Moving from an ownership model to a rental model is very ant…

With the new model, consumers have two options now, instead of just one. They can rent the game or they can buy it. How is that not better?

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#396
post #392
post #365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> That split between production and distribution has to come back. What if Netflix had made and won that argument before 2020 to prevent production companies from also streaming content? I think Netflix missed a trick here.

But then it wouldn't have been long before competitors emerged in the market threatening Netflix's content deals. I believe only way to reinforce their position was to make their own content.

Netflix with decades of experience in streaming and negotiating content deals would have had some incumbency/first mover advantages.

It could have led the distribution/streaming industry instead of being just another content/streaming player.

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#397

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A portable console.

So you'd put the Gameboy for example on par with the PlayStation? Despite one being portable and the other not?

Strawman (gameboy hasn’t been a thing for a decade) but looking past your fallacy I sure do: plenty of kids only get one or the other for Christmas.

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#398
post #2

Microsoft employee here, opinions my own. I work in gaming at Microsoft and I really enjoy it. I think Microsoft gives us a ton of space to explore and make our own impact and I am a huge fan* of Phil Spencer. > Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision has been described as the largest in tech history. It deserves scrutiny. That scrutiny has paid off: Microsoft has committed in writing, in public, and in court to keep C…

> Microsoft has committed in writing, in public, and in court to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation for 10 years on parity with Xbox.

Yeah, heard that one before.

> Oh but we promised Call of Duty and this is Duty Called, so we don't have to care about anything we have promised before.

I mean, this is Microsoft.

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#399

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's not the Boogeyman you think it is. You used to have to buy a game for $60 and if you didn't like it? Well too bad, that's $60 down the drain. Now you can just move on to the next one. I get that for enthusiasts owning a physical game may be more desirable, but for the majority of gamers (casual gamers) a subscription based service is a better option. Moving from an ownership model to a rental model is very ant…

With the new model, consumers have two options now, instead of just one. They can rent the game or they can buy it. How is that not better?

Because tomorrow, they'll take away the option to buy the game. Everyone in the games industry is excited about streaming specifically because making everyone rent their games is long-term more lucrative.

We've done this dance with streaming video in the past. First renting was cheaper and easier. Then renting was the only option, and it stopped being cheaper or easier.

Re: Microsoft wins FTC fight to buy Activision Blizzard

#400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I get that for enthusiasts owning a physical game may be more desirable It is more desirable. So is not having to be connected to the internet to play your games. So is not paying for something that can be taken from you at any time for any reason without reimbursement. So is having a copy of your game that can't be edited or censored at any time (including silently) and which can always be played in its original f…

Thank you for this comment. I relate to every one of your points. Especially the silent/forced updates. It can be SO bad in games. since the OP is about blizzard- look at hearthstone. Its a card game where you can’t trade, and the cards you sank money into can just get nerfed when the next expansion comes out. It amazes me this is acceptable to some.

years and years ago I played hearthstone but after a couple seasons of "surprise your decks don't work anymore" I realized this was just an endless grind to get me to buy more packs and never logged in again.
Post reply on HN