Web3 is dead. Please stop.
Just for the sake of clarity in communication, OP has chosen to define “death” as $1.72 billion of on-chain transaction volume in the last 24h [0] [0] https://defillama.com/dexs
Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
21–30 of 56 posts
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just for the sake of clarity in communication, OP has chosen to define “death” as $1.72 billion of on-chain transaction volume in the last 24h [0] [0] https://defillama.com/dexs
Bot-to-bot wash trades as evidence of legitimacy, classic web3.
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#23I highly doubt this is a viable approach.
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#24How many different versions of something like a twitter-clone (as an example) are users willing to try? Buttons moving around, functionality changed or maybe even lost because the majority of the users don't want an edit button? I highly doubt this is a viable approach.
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#25Web3 is dead. Please stop.
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#26Going to do y'all a favor and explain EXACTLY why this (and most DAO-like thingies) are goofy. The issue is trust. What you're trying to do is to encode trust and incentives among human beings, and it's far easier to do that WITHOUT complicating it via code.
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#27What is wrong with open and simple protocols, like NOSTR? Thanks to the different NIPs (NOSTR Improvement Proposals) [1] any client can choose to support or ignore anything that another has bolted on.
And incentives for developers, you ask? If your client or relay is truly better than the competition, then users want to use your software/Webapp. They will not mind paying a small fee to use it, which has been possible for years by using value4value-like systems. [2]
[1] https://binayatripathi-1.gitbook.io/stacks-+-nostr/sip-and-n...
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bot-to-bot wash trades as evidence of legitimacy, classic web3.
Unsupported conspiracy theories, classic cryptophobia.
2019: https://anchainai.medium.com/our-ai-detects-your-ai-revealin...
2022: https://twitter.com/messaricrypto/status/1599916553780137985
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#29Going to do y'all a favor and explain EXACTLY why this (and most DAO-like thingies) are goofy. The issue is trust. What you're trying to do is to encode trust and incentives among human beings, and it's far easier to do that WITHOUT complicating it via code.
Ultimately, open source code has a higher safety potential than the integrity of individuals, so I believe static services will trend toward becoming Ethereum protocols.
Re: Darwin: A framework for evolving decentralized web apps
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Survival of the fittest "Darwin" project?
Only if they all were competing in the same market. Since they aren't, I like to think of it more as them competing for which one becomes the base meme. When people think of "dog" which variant do they imagine? Lab, husky, french bulldog, or something else? Which dog type "won" and created the strongest meme?